Re: [PATCH 3/5] mtd: rawnand: mtk: Add validity check for CE# pin setting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Xiaolei,

Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Mon, 29 Apr 2019 14:38:32
+0800:

> Currently, we only check how many CE# pins are set in device tree.
> But it should be necessary to check whether CE# pin setting is
> duplicated or if CE# pin index exceeds the maximum CE# number that
> controller supports.
> 
> So, add validity check to avoid these invalid settings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c
> index a2f7af536380..7a5e8c9cf61b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c
> @@ -162,6 +162,8 @@ struct mtk_nfc {
>  	struct list_head chips;
>  
>  	u8 *buffer;
> +
> +	unsigned long assigned_cs;
>  };
>  
>  /*
> @@ -1351,6 +1353,17 @@ static int mtk_nfc_nand_chip_init(struct device *dev, struct mtk_nfc *nfc,
>  			dev_err(dev, "reg property failure : %d\n", ret);
>  			return ret;
>  		}
> +
> +		if (tmp >= MTK_NAND_MAX_NSELS) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "invalid CS: %u\n", tmp);
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (test_and_set_bit(tmp, &nfc->assigned_cs)) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "CS %u already assigned\n", tmp);
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +
>  		chip->sels[i] = tmp;
>  	}
>  

Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>


Thanks,
Miquèl

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/




[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux