On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:39:13AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> > > ->lookup() in an encrypted directory begins as follows: > > 1. fscrypt_prepare_lookup(): > a. Try to load the directory's encryption key. > b. If the key is unavailable, mark the dentry as a ciphertext name > via d_flags. > 2. fscrypt_setup_filename(): > a. Try to load the directory's encryption key. > b. If the key is available, encrypt the name (treated as a plaintext > name) to get the on-disk name. Otherwise decode the name > (treated as a ciphertext name) to get the on-disk name. > > But if the key is concurrently added, it may be found at (2a) but not at > (1a). In this case, the dentry will be wrongly marked as a ciphertext > name even though it was actually treated as plaintext. > > This will cause the dentry to be wrongly invalidated on the next lookup, > potentially causing problems. For example, if the racy ->lookup() was > part of sys_mount(), then the new mount will be detached when anything > tries to access it. This is despite the mountpoint having a plaintext > path, which should remain valid now that the key was added. > > Of course, this is only possible if there's a userspace race. Still, > the additional kernel-side race is confusing and unexpected. > > Close the kernel-side race by changing fscrypt_prepare_lookup() to also > set the on-disk filename (step 2b), consistent with the d_flags update. > > Fixes: 28b4c263961c ("ext4 crypto: revalidate dentry after adding or removing the key") > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> Looks good, applied. - Ted ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/