From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@xxxxxxxxxx> It is known that some ESMT SLC NANDs have been shipped with the factory bad block markers in the first or last page of the block, instead of the first or second page. To be on the safe side, let's check all three locations. Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_esmt.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_esmt.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_esmt.c index 58646ed663ac..3338c68aaaf1 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_esmt.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_esmt.c @@ -36,7 +36,14 @@ static void esmt_nand_decode_id(struct nand_chip *chip) static int esmt_nand_init(struct nand_chip *chip) { if (nand_is_slc(chip)) - chip->options |= NAND_BBM_FIRSTPAGE | NAND_BBM_SECONDPAGE; + /* + * It is known that some ESMT SLC NANDs have been shipped + * with the factory bad block markers in the first or last page + * of the block, instead of the first or second page. To be on + * the safe side, let's check all three locations. + */ + chip->options |= NAND_BBM_FIRSTPAGE | NAND_BBM_SECONDPAGE | + NAND_BBM_LASTPAGE; return 0; } -- 2.17.1 ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/