Hi Tudor, On 15/04/19 1:43 PM, Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hi, > > The general approach looks good, few comments below. > > On 04/09/2019 07:26 PM, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote: >> External E-Mail >> >> >> From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> The m25p80 driver is actually a generic wrapper around the spi-mem >> layer. Not only the driver name is misleading, but we'd expect such a >> common logic to be directly available in the core. Another reason for >> moving this code is that SPI NOR controller drivers should >> progressively be replaced by SPI controller drivers implementing the >> spi_mem_ops interface, and when the conversion is done, we should have >> a single spi-nor driver directly interfacing with the spi-mem layer. >> >> While moving the code we also fix a longstanding issue when >> non-DMA-able buffers are passed by the MTD layer. >> >> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> [vigneshr@xxxxxx: use devm_kmalloc() for bounce buffer allocation] >> Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@xxxxxx> >> --- >> Changes from RFC: >> * Use devm_kmalloc() for bounce buffer allocation as it supports cache >> line aligned buffers now > > then spi-nand has to be updated too. > Yes, but as a separate patch I presume. [...] >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c >> index 73172d7f512b..03c8c346c9ae 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c >> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ >> >> #include <linux/mtd/mtd.h> >> #include <linux/of_platform.h> >> +#include <linux/sched/task_stack.h> >> #include <linux/spi/flash.h> >> #include <linux/mtd/spi-nor.h> >> >> @@ -288,6 +289,174 @@ struct flash_info { >> >> #define JEDEC_MFR(info) ((info)->id[0]) >> >> +static int spi_nor_exec_op(struct spi_nor *nor, struct spi_mem_op *op, >> + u64 *addr, void *buf, unsigned int len) > > size_t for len? > Right will fix throughout. I am also thinking of updating op.data.nbytes to size_t type in spi-mem.h (and also spi_mem_dirmap_info->length) as part of a separate patch. >> +{ >> + int ret; >> + bool usebouncebuf; >> + >> + if (!op || (len && !buf)) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + if (op->addr.nbytes && addr) >> + op->addr.val = *addr; >> + >> + op->data.nbytes = len; >> + >> + if (object_is_on_stack(buf) || !virt_addr_valid(buf)) >> + usebouncebuf = true; >> + if (len && usebouncebuf) { >> + if (len > nor->bouncebuf_size) >> + return -ENOTSUPP; >> + >> + if (op->data.dir == SPI_MEM_DATA_IN) { >> + op->data.buf.in = nor->bouncebuf; >> + } else { >> + op->data.buf.out = nor->bouncebuf; >> + memcpy(nor->bouncebuf, buf, len); >> + } >> + } else { >> + op->data.buf.out = buf; >> + } >> + >> + ret = spi_mem_exec_op(nor->spimem, op); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + if (usebouncebuf && len && op->data.dir == SPI_MEM_DATA_IN) >> + memcpy(buf, nor->bouncebuf, len); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int spi_nor_data_op(struct spi_nor *nor, struct spi_mem_op *op, >> + void *buf, unsigned int len) > > size_t for len? > Ok >> +{ >> + return spi_nor_exec_op(nor, op, NULL, buf, len); >> +} >> + >> +static int spi_nor_nodata_op(struct spi_nor *nor, struct spi_mem_op *op) >> +{ >> + return spi_nor_exec_op(nor, op, NULL, NULL, 0); >> +} >> + >> +static ssize_t spi_nor_spimem_read_data(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, >> + size_t len, u8 *buf) >> +{ >> + struct spi_mem_op op = SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(nor->read_opcode, 1), >> + SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(nor->addr_width, ofs, >> + 1), >> + SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(nor->read_dummy, 1), >> + SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 1)); >> + bool usebouncebuf = false; >> + size_t remaining = len; >> + int ret; >> + >> + if (object_is_on_stack(buf) || !virt_addr_valid(buf)) { >> + usebouncebuf = true; >> + op.data.buf.in = nor->bouncebuf; >> + } >> + >> + /* get transfer protocols. */ >> + op.cmd.buswidth = spi_nor_get_protocol_inst_nbits(nor->read_proto); >> + op.addr.buswidth = spi_nor_get_protocol_addr_nbits(nor->read_proto); >> + op.dummy.buswidth = op.addr.buswidth; >> + op.data.buswidth = spi_nor_get_protocol_data_nbits(nor->read_proto); >> + >> + /* convert the dummy cycles to the number of bytes */ >> + op.dummy.nbytes = (nor->read_dummy * op.dummy.buswidth) / 8; >> + >> + while (remaining) { > > Can't we get rid of this while? See Andrey's patch at > https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/4/1/32. Andrey's patches are not included in this > patch. We should consider integrating his work first, or squash his work in this > patch, or ask him to rework the series after this patch gets accepted. I'll let > you decide. > I think its better to squash that series into this patch. Will take care of that >> + op.data.nbytes = remaining < UINT_MAX ? remaining : UINT_MAX; >> + if (!usebouncebuf) >> + op.data.buf.out = buf; >> + else if (op.data.nbytes > nor->bouncebuf_size) >> + op.data.nbytes = nor->bouncebuf_size; >> + >> + ret = spi_mem_adjust_op_size(nor->spimem, &op); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + ret = spi_mem_exec_op(nor->spimem, &op); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + if (usebouncebuf) >> + memcpy(buf, nor->bouncebuf, op.data.nbytes); >> + >> + op.addr.val += op.data.nbytes; >> + remaining -= op.data.nbytes; >> + buf += op.data.nbytes; >> + } >> + >> + return len; >> +} >> + >> +static ssize_t spi_nor_read_data(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, size_t len, >> + u8 *buf) >> +{ >> + if (nor->spimem) >> + return spi_nor_spimem_read_data(nor, ofs, len, buf); >> + >> + return nor->read(nor, ofs, len, buf); >> +} >> + >> +static ssize_t spi_nor_spimem_write_data(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, >> + size_t len, const u8 *buf) >> +{ >> + struct spi_mem_op op = SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(nor->program_opcode, > > how about moving SPI_MEM_OP() to the next line to avoid breaking lines below? > General comment. > Agreed, will fix. >> + 1), >> + SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(nor->addr_width, ofs, >> + 1), >> + SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY, >> + SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_OUT(len, NULL, 1)); >> + bool usebouncebuf = false; >> + int ret; >> + >> + if (object_is_on_stack(buf) || !virt_addr_valid(buf)) { >> + usebouncebuf = true; >> + op.data.buf.out = nor->bouncebuf; >> + } >> + >> + /* get transfer protocols. */ >> + op.cmd.buswidth = spi_nor_get_protocol_inst_nbits(nor->write_proto); >> + op.addr.buswidth = spi_nor_get_protocol_addr_nbits(nor->write_proto); >> + op.data.buswidth = spi_nor_get_protocol_data_nbits(nor->write_proto); >> + >> + if (nor->program_opcode == SPINOR_OP_AAI_WP && nor->sst_write_second) >> + op.addr.nbytes = 0; >> + >> + op.data.nbytes = len < UINT_MAX ? len : UINT_MAX; >> + >> + if (!usebouncebuf) { >> + op.data.buf.out = buf; >> + } else { >> + if (op.data.nbytes > nor->bouncebuf_size) >> + op.data.nbytes = nor->bouncebuf_size; >> + >> + memcpy(nor->bouncebuf, buf, op.data.nbytes); >> + } >> + >> + ret = spi_mem_adjust_op_size(nor->spimem, &op); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + ret = spi_mem_exec_op(nor->spimem, &op); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + return op.data.nbytes; >> +} >> + [...] >> /* Enable/disable 4-byte addressing mode. */ >> static int set_4byte(struct spi_nor *nor, bool enable) >> { >> int status; >> bool need_wren = false; >> - u8 cmd; >> >> switch (JEDEC_MFR(nor->info)) { >> case SNOR_MFR_ST: >> @@ -486,8 +752,7 @@ static int set_4byte(struct spi_nor *nor, bool enable) >> if (need_wren) >> write_enable(nor); >> >> - cmd = enable ? SPINOR_OP_EN4B : SPINOR_OP_EX4B; >> - status = nor->write_reg(nor, cmd, NULL, 0); >> + status = macronix_set_4byte(nor, enable); >> if (need_wren) >> write_disable(nor); >> >> @@ -500,8 +765,7 @@ static int set_4byte(struct spi_nor *nor, bool enable) >> * We must clear the register to enable normal behavior. >> */ >> write_enable(nor); >> - nor->cmd_buf[0] = 0; >> - nor->write_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_WREAR, nor->cmd_buf, 1); >> + write_ear(nor, 0); >> write_disable(nor); >> } >> >> @@ -509,16 +773,42 @@ static int set_4byte(struct spi_nor *nor, bool enable) >> default: >> /* Spansion style */ > > how about introducing a spansion_set_4byte() and return it directly? Will do. > >> nor->cmd_buf[0] = enable << 7; >> + >> + if (nor->spimem) { >> + struct spi_mem_op op = SPI_MEM_OP( >> + SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(SPINOR_OP_BRWR, 1), >> + SPI_MEM_OP_NO_ADDR, >> + SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY, >> + SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_OUT(1, NULL, 1)); >> + >> + return spi_nor_data_op(nor, &op, nor->cmd_buf, 1); >> + } >> + >> return nor->write_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_BRWR, nor->cmd_buf, 1); >> } >> } >> >> +static int xread_sr(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 *sr) > > spi_nor_xread_sr? > Ok >> +{ >> + if (nor->spimem) { >> + struct spi_mem_op op = SPI_MEM_OP( >> + SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(SPINOR_OP_XRDSR, 1), >> + SPI_MEM_OP_NO_ADDR, >> + SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY, >> + SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(0, NULL, 1)); >> + >> + return spi_nor_data_op(nor, &op, sr, 1); >> + } >> + >> + return nor->read_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_XRDSR, sr, 1); >> +} >> + >> static int s3an_sr_ready(struct spi_nor *nor) >> { >> int ret; >> u8 val; >> >> - ret = nor->read_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_XRDSR, &val, 1); >> + ret = xread_sr(nor, &val); >> if (ret < 0) { >> dev_err(nor->dev, "error %d reading XRDSR\n", (int) ret); >> return ret; >> @@ -527,6 +817,21 @@ static int s3an_sr_ready(struct spi_nor *nor) >> return !!(val & XSR_RDY); >> } >> >> +static int clear_sr(struct spi_nor *nor) > > spi_nor_clear_sr? > Ok >> +{ >> + if (nor->spimem) { >> + struct spi_mem_op op = SPI_MEM_OP( >> + SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(SPINOR_OP_CLSR, 1), >> + SPI_MEM_OP_NO_ADDR, >> + SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY, >> + SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DATA); >> + >> + return spi_nor_nodata_op(nor, &op); >> + } >> + >> + return nor->write_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_CLSR, NULL, 0); >> +} >> + >> static int spi_nor_sr_ready(struct spi_nor *nor) >> { >> int sr = read_sr(nor); >> @@ -539,13 +844,28 @@ static int spi_nor_sr_ready(struct spi_nor *nor) >> else >> dev_err(nor->dev, "Programming Error occurred\n"); >> >> - nor->write_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_CLSR, NULL, 0); >> + clear_sr(nor); >> return -EIO; >> } >> >> return !(sr & SR_WIP); >> } >> >> +static int clear_fsr(struct spi_nor *nor) > > spi_nor_clear_fsr? > Ok >> +{ >> + if (nor->spimem) { >> + struct spi_mem_op op = SPI_MEM_OP( >> + SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(SPINOR_OP_CLFSR, 1), >> + SPI_MEM_OP_NO_ADDR, >> + SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY, >> + SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DATA); >> + >> + return spi_nor_nodata_op(nor, &op); >> + } >> + >> + return nor->write_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_CLFSR, NULL, 0); >> +} >> + >> static int spi_nor_fsr_ready(struct spi_nor *nor) >> { >> int fsr = read_fsr(nor); >> @@ -562,7 +882,7 @@ static int spi_nor_fsr_ready(struct spi_nor *nor) >> dev_err(nor->dev, >> "Attempted to modify a protected sector.\n"); >> >> - nor->write_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_CLFSR, NULL, 0); >> + clear_fsr(nor); >> return -EIO; >> } >> >> @@ -630,6 +950,16 @@ static int erase_chip(struct spi_nor *nor) >> { >> dev_dbg(nor->dev, " %lldKiB\n", (long long)(nor->mtd.size >> 10)); >> >> + if (nor->spimem) { >> + struct spi_mem_op op = SPI_MEM_OP( >> + SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(SPINOR_OP_CHIP_ERASE, 1), >> + SPI_MEM_OP_NO_ADDR, >> + SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY, >> + SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DATA); >> + >> + return spi_nor_nodata_op(nor, &op); >> + } >> + >> return nor->write_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_CHIP_ERASE, NULL, 0); >> } >> >> @@ -692,6 +1022,17 @@ static int spi_nor_erase_sector(struct spi_nor *nor, u32 addr) >> if (nor->erase) >> return nor->erase(nor, addr); >> >> + if (nor->spimem) { >> + struct spi_mem_op op = SPI_MEM_OP( >> + SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(nor->erase_opcode, 1), >> + SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(nor->addr_width, addr, >> + 1), >> + SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY, >> + SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DATA); >> + >> + return spi_nor_nodata_op(nor, &op); >> + } >> + >> /* >> * Default implementation, if driver doesn't have a specialized HW >> * control >> @@ -1406,7 +1747,18 @@ static int write_sr_cr(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 *sr_cr) >> >> write_enable(nor); >> >> - ret = nor->write_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_WRSR, sr_cr, 2); >> + if (nor->spimem) { >> + struct spi_mem_op op = SPI_MEM_OP( >> + SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(SPINOR_OP_WRSR, 1), >> + SPI_MEM_OP_NO_ADDR, >> + SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY, >> + SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_OUT(0, NULL, 1)); >> + >> + ret = spi_nor_data_op(nor, &op, sr_cr, 2); >> + } else { >> + ret = nor->write_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_WRSR, sr_cr, 2); >> + } >> + >> if (ret < 0) { >> dev_err(nor->dev, >> "error while writing configuration register\n"); >> @@ -1585,6 +1937,36 @@ static int spansion_read_cr_quad_enable(struct spi_nor *nor) >> return 0; >> } >> >> +static int write_sr2(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 sr2) > > spi_nor_write_sr2? > Ok >> +{ >> + if (nor->spimem) { >> + struct spi_mem_op op = SPI_MEM_OP( >> + SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(SPINOR_OP_WRSR2, 1), >> + SPI_MEM_OP_NO_ADDR, >> + SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY, >> + SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_OUT(0, NULL, 1)); >> + >> + return spi_nor_data_op(nor, &op, &sr2, 1); >> + } >> + >> + return nor->write_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_WRSR2, &sr2, 1); >> +} >> + >> +static int read_sr2(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 *sr2) > > spi_nor_read_sr2? > Ok >> +{ >> + if (nor->spimem) { >> + struct spi_mem_op op = SPI_MEM_OP( >> + SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(SPINOR_OP_RDSR2, 1), >> + SPI_MEM_OP_NO_ADDR, >> + SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY, >> + SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(0, NULL, 1)); >> + >> + return spi_nor_data_op(nor, &op, sr2, 1); >> + } >> + >> + return nor->read_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_RDSR2, sr2, 1); >> +} >> + >> /** >> * sr2_bit7_quad_enable() - set QE bit in Status Register 2. >> * @nor: pointer to a 'struct spi_nor' >> @@ -1603,7 +1985,7 @@ static int sr2_bit7_quad_enable(struct spi_nor *nor) >> int ret; >> >> /* Check current Quad Enable bit value. */ >> - ret = nor->read_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_RDSR2, &sr2, 1); >> + ret = read_sr2(nor, &sr2); >> if (ret) >> return ret; >> if (sr2 & SR2_QUAD_EN_BIT7) >> @@ -1614,7 +1996,7 @@ static int sr2_bit7_quad_enable(struct spi_nor *nor) >> >> write_enable(nor); >> >> - ret = nor->write_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_WRSR2, &sr2, 1); >> + ret = write_sr2(nor, sr2); >> if (ret < 0) { >> dev_err(nor->dev, "error while writing status register 2\n"); >> return -EINVAL; >> @@ -1626,8 +2008,7 @@ static int sr2_bit7_quad_enable(struct spi_nor *nor) >> return ret; >> } >> >> - /* Read back and check it. */ >> - ret = nor->read_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_RDSR2, &sr2, 1); >> + ret = read_sr2(nor, &sr2); >> if (!(ret > 0 && (sr2 & SR2_QUAD_EN_BIT7))) { >> dev_err(nor->dev, "SR2 Quad bit not set\n"); >> return -EINVAL; >> @@ -2054,13 +2435,28 @@ static const struct flash_info spi_nor_ids[] = { >> { }, >> }; >> >> +static int read_id(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 *id) > > this function is called just from spi_nor_read_id(). How about incorporating > this code into spi_nor_read_id() so that we use functions that are prepended > with "spi_nor" to not pollute the namespace? I agree, but inlining this code would break 80 char limit due to extra indentation required for nor->read_reg() call below. So how about renaming this function to spi_nor_read_id() and current spi_nor_read_id() function to spi_nor_get_flash_info()? >> +{ >> + if (nor->spimem) { >> + struct spi_mem_op op = SPI_MEM_OP( >> + SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(SPINOR_OP_RDID, 1), >> + SPI_MEM_OP_NO_ADDR, >> + SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY, >> + SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(0, NULL, 1)); >> + >> + return spi_nor_data_op(nor, &op, id, SPI_NOR_MAX_ID_LEN); >> + } >> + >> + return nor->read_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_RDID, id, SPI_NOR_MAX_ID_LEN); >> +} >> + >> static const struct flash_info *spi_nor_read_id(struct spi_nor *nor) >> { >> int tmp; >> u8 id[SPI_NOR_MAX_ID_LEN]; >> const struct flash_info *info; >> >> - tmp = nor->read_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_RDID, id, SPI_NOR_MAX_ID_LEN); >> + tmp = read_id(nor, id); >> if (tmp < 0) { >> dev_dbg(nor->dev, "error %d reading JEDEC ID\n", tmp); >> return ERR_PTR(tmp); >> @@ -2096,7 +2492,7 @@ static int spi_nor_read(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from, size_t len, >> if (nor->flags & SNOR_F_S3AN_ADDR_DEFAULT) >> addr = spi_nor_s3an_addr_convert(nor, addr); >> >> - ret = nor->read(nor, addr, len, buf); >> + ret = spi_nor_read_data(nor, addr, len, buf); >> if (ret == 0) { >> /* We shouldn't see 0-length reads */ >> ret = -EIO; >> @@ -2141,7 +2537,7 @@ static int sst_write(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to, size_t len, >> nor->program_opcode = SPINOR_OP_BP; >> >> /* write one byte. */ >> - ret = nor->write(nor, to, 1, buf); >> + ret = spi_nor_write_data(nor, to, 1, buf); >> if (ret < 0) >> goto sst_write_err; >> WARN(ret != 1, "While writing 1 byte written %i bytes\n", >> @@ -2157,7 +2553,7 @@ static int sst_write(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to, size_t len, >> nor->program_opcode = SPINOR_OP_AAI_WP; >> >> /* write two bytes. */ >> - ret = nor->write(nor, to, 2, buf + actual); >> + ret = spi_nor_write_data(nor, to, 2, buf + actual); >> if (ret < 0) >> goto sst_write_err; >> WARN(ret != 2, "While writing 2 bytes written %i bytes\n", >> @@ -2180,7 +2576,7 @@ static int sst_write(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to, size_t len, >> write_enable(nor); >> >> nor->program_opcode = SPINOR_OP_BP; >> - ret = nor->write(nor, to, 1, buf + actual); >> + ret = spi_nor_write_data(nor, to, 1, buf + actual); >> if (ret < 0) >> goto sst_write_err; >> WARN(ret != 1, "While writing 1 byte written %i bytes\n", >> @@ -2242,7 +2638,7 @@ static int spi_nor_write(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to, size_t len, >> addr = spi_nor_s3an_addr_convert(nor, addr); >> >> write_enable(nor); >> - ret = nor->write(nor, addr, page_remain, buf + i); >> + ret = spi_nor_write_data(nor, addr, page_remain, buf + i); >> if (ret < 0) >> goto write_err; >> written = ret; >> @@ -2261,8 +2657,10 @@ static int spi_nor_write(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to, size_t len, >> >> static int spi_nor_check(struct spi_nor *nor) >> { >> - if (!nor->dev || !nor->read || !nor->write || >> - !nor->read_reg || !nor->write_reg) { >> + if (!nor->dev || >> + (!nor->spimem && >> + (!nor->read || !nor->write || !nor->read_reg || >> + !nor->write_reg))) { >> pr_err("spi-nor: please fill all the necessary fields!\n"); >> return -EINVAL; >> } >> @@ -2275,7 +2673,7 @@ static int s3an_nor_scan(struct spi_nor *nor) >> int ret; >> u8 val; >> >> - ret = nor->read_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_XRDSR, &val, 1); >> + ret = xread_sr(nor, &val); >> if (ret < 0) { >> dev_err(nor->dev, "error %d reading XRDSR\n", (int) ret); >> return ret; >> @@ -2405,7 +2803,7 @@ static int spi_nor_read_raw(struct spi_nor *nor, u32 addr, size_t len, u8 *buf) >> int ret; >> >> while (len) { >> - ret = nor->read(nor, addr, len, buf); >> + ret = spi_nor_read_data(nor, addr, len, buf); >> if (!ret || ret > len) >> return -EIO; >> if (ret < 0) >> @@ -4188,6 +4586,215 @@ int spi_nor_scan(struct spi_nor *nor, const char *name, >> } >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_nor_scan); >> >> +static int spi_nor_probe(struct spi_mem *spimem) >> +{ >> + struct spi_device *spi = spimem->spi; >> + struct flash_platform_data *data; >> + struct spi_nor *nor; >> + struct spi_nor_hwcaps hwcaps = { >> + .mask = SNOR_HWCAPS_READ | >> + SNOR_HWCAPS_READ_FAST | >> + SNOR_HWCAPS_PP, >> + }; >> + char *flash_name; >> + int ret; >> + >> + data = dev_get_platdata(&spi->dev); > > you can do the initialization at declaration > will update.. >> + >> + nor = devm_kzalloc(&spi->dev, sizeof(*nor), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!nor) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + /* >> + * We need the bounce buffer early to read/write registers when going >> + * through the spi-mem layer (buffers have to be DMA-able). >> + * We'll reallocate a new buffer if nor->page_size turns out to be >> + * greater than PAGE_SIZE (which shouldn't happen before long since NOR >> + * pages are usually less than 1KB) after spi_nor_scan() returns. >> + */ >> + nor->bouncebuf_size = PAGE_SIZE; >> + nor->bouncebuf = devm_kmalloc(&spi->dev, nor->bouncebuf_size, >> + GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!nor->bouncebuf) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + nor->spimem = spimem; >> + nor->dev = &spi->dev; >> + spi_nor_set_flash_node(nor, spi->dev.of_node); >> + >> + spi_mem_set_drvdata(spimem, nor); >> + >> + if (spi->mode & SPI_RX_OCTAL) { >> + hwcaps.mask |= SNOR_HWCAPS_READ_1_1_8; >> + >> + if (spi->mode & SPI_TX_OCTAL) >> + hwcaps.mask |= (SNOR_HWCAPS_READ_1_8_8 | >> + SNOR_HWCAPS_PP_1_1_8 | >> + SNOR_HWCAPS_PP_1_8_8); >> + } else if (spi->mode & SPI_RX_QUAD) { >> + hwcaps.mask |= SNOR_HWCAPS_READ_1_1_4; >> + >> + if (spi->mode & SPI_TX_QUAD) >> + hwcaps.mask |= (SNOR_HWCAPS_READ_1_4_4 | >> + SNOR_HWCAPS_PP_1_1_4 | >> + SNOR_HWCAPS_PP_1_4_4); >> + } else if (spi->mode & SPI_RX_DUAL) { >> + hwcaps.mask |= SNOR_HWCAPS_READ_1_1_2; >> + >> + if (spi->mode & SPI_TX_DUAL) >> + hwcaps.mask |= SNOR_HWCAPS_READ_1_2_2; >> + } >> + >> + if (data && data->name) >> + nor->mtd.name = data->name; >> + >> + if (!nor->mtd.name) >> + nor->mtd.name = spi_mem_get_name(spimem); >> + >> + /* >> + * For some (historical?) reason many platforms provide two different >> + * names in flash_platform_data: "name" and "type". Quite often name is >> + * set to "m25p80" and then "type" provides a real chip name. >> + * If that's the case, respect "type" and ignore a "name". >> + */ >> + if (data && data->type) >> + flash_name = data->type; >> + else if (!strcmp(spi->modalias, "spi-nor")) >> + flash_name = NULL; /* auto-detect */ >> + else >> + flash_name = spi->modalias; >> + >> + ret = spi_nor_scan(nor, flash_name, &hwcaps); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + /* >> + * None of the existing parts have > 512B pages, but let's play safe >> + * and add this logic so that if anyone ever adds support for such >> + * a NOR we don't end up with buffer overflows. >> + */ >> + if (nor->page_size > PAGE_SIZE) { >> + nor->bouncebuf_size = nor->page_size; >> + devm_kfree(nor->dev, nor->bouncebuf); >> + nor->bouncebuf = devm_kmalloc(nor->dev, >> + nor->bouncebuf_size, >> + GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!nor->bouncebuf) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + } >> + >> + return mtd_device_register(&nor->mtd, data ? data->parts : NULL, >> + data ? data->nr_parts : 0); >> +} >> + >> +static int spi_nor_remove(struct spi_mem *spimem) >> +{ >> + struct spi_nor *nor = spi_mem_get_drvdata(spimem); >> + int ret; >> + >> + spi_nor_restore(nor); >> + >> + /* Clean up MTD stuff. */ >> + ret = mtd_device_unregister(&nor->mtd); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret;> + >> + return 0; > > return mtd_device_unregister(&nor->mtd); directly Ok > >> +} >> + >> +static void spi_nor_shutdown(struct spi_mem *spimem) >> +{ >> + struct spi_nor *nor = spi_mem_get_drvdata(spimem); >> + >> + spi_nor_restore(nor); >> +} >> + >> +/* >> + * Do NOT add to this array without reading the following: >> + * >> + * Historically, many flash devices are bound to this driver by their name. But >> + * since most of these flash are compatible to some extent, and their >> + * differences can often be differentiated by the JEDEC read-ID command, we >> + * encourage new users to add support to the spi-nor library, and simply bind >> + * against a generic string here (e.g., "jedec,spi-nor"). >> + * >> + * Many flash names are kept here in this list (as well as in spi-nor.c) to >> + * keep them available as module aliases for existing platforms. >> + */ >> +static const struct spi_device_id spi_nor_dev_ids[] = { >> + /* >> + * Allow non-DT platform devices to bind to the "spi-nor" modalias, and >> + * hack around the fact that the SPI core does not provide uevent >> + * matching for .of_match_table >> + */ >> + {"spi-nor"}, >> + >> + /* >> + * Entries not used in DTs that should be safe to drop after replacing >> + * them with "spi-nor" in platform data. >> + */ >> + {"s25sl064a"}, {"w25x16"}, {"m25p10"}, {"m25px64"}, >> + >> + /* >> + * Entries that were used in DTs without "jedec,spi-nor" fallback and >> + * should be kept for backward compatibility. >> + */ >> + {"at25df321a"}, {"at25df641"}, {"at26df081a"}, >> + {"mx25l4005a"}, {"mx25l1606e"}, {"mx25l6405d"}, {"mx25l12805d"}, >> + {"mx25l25635e"},{"mx66l51235l"}, >> + {"n25q064"}, {"n25q128a11"}, {"n25q128a13"}, {"n25q512a"}, >> + {"s25fl256s1"}, {"s25fl512s"}, {"s25sl12801"}, {"s25fl008k"}, >> + {"s25fl064k"}, >> + {"sst25vf040b"},{"sst25vf016b"},{"sst25vf032b"},{"sst25wf040"}, >> + {"m25p40"}, {"m25p80"}, {"m25p16"}, {"m25p32"}, >> + {"m25p64"}, {"m25p128"}, >> + {"w25x80"}, {"w25x32"}, {"w25q32"}, {"w25q32dw"}, >> + {"w25q80bl"}, {"w25q128"}, {"w25q256"}, >> + >> + /* Flashes that can't be detected using JEDEC */ >> + {"m25p05-nonjedec"}, {"m25p10-nonjedec"}, {"m25p20-nonjedec"}, >> + {"m25p40-nonjedec"}, {"m25p80-nonjedec"}, {"m25p16-nonjedec"}, >> + {"m25p32-nonjedec"}, {"m25p64-nonjedec"}, {"m25p128-nonjedec"}, >> + >> + /* Everspin MRAMs (non-JEDEC) */ >> + { "mr25h128" }, /* 128 Kib, 40 MHz */ >> + { "mr25h256" }, /* 256 Kib, 40 MHz */ >> + { "mr25h10" }, /* 1 Mib, 40 MHz */ >> + { "mr25h40" }, /* 4 Mib, 40 MHz */ >> + >> + { }, >> +}; >> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, spi_nor_dev_ids); >> + >> +static const struct of_device_id spi_nor_of_table[] = { >> + /* >> + * Generic compatibility for SPI NOR that can be identified by the >> + * JEDEC READ ID opcode (0x9F). Use this, if possible. >> + */ >> + { .compatible = "jedec,spi-nor" }, >> + { /* sentinel */ }, >> +}; >> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, spi_nor_of_table); >> + >> +/* >> + * REVISIT: many of these chips have deep power-down modes, which >> + * should clearly be entered on suspend() to minimize power use. >> + * And also when they're otherwise idle... >> + */ >> +static struct spi_mem_driver spi_nor_driver = { >> + .spidrv = { >> + .driver = { >> + .name = "spi-nor", >> + .of_match_table = spi_nor_of_table, >> + }, >> + .id_table = spi_nor_dev_ids, >> + }, >> + .probe = spi_nor_probe, >> + .remove = spi_nor_remove, >> + .shutdown = spi_nor_shutdown, >> +}; >> +module_spi_mem_driver(spi_nor_driver); >> + >> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); >> MODULE_AUTHOR("Huang Shijie <shijie8@xxxxxxxxx>"); >> MODULE_AUTHOR("Mike Lavender"); >> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h b/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h >> index b3d360b0ee3d..ac16745f5ef8 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h >> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h >> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ >> #include <linux/bitops.h> >> #include <linux/mtd/cfi.h> >> #include <linux/mtd/mtd.h> >> +#include <linux/spi/spi-mem.h> >> >> /* >> * Manufacturer IDs >> @@ -344,6 +345,10 @@ struct flash_info; >> * @mtd: point to a mtd_info structure >> * @lock: the lock for the read/write/erase/lock/unlock operations >> * @dev: point to a spi device, or a spi nor controller device. >> + * @spimem: point to the spi mem device >> + * @bouncebuf: bounce buffer used when the buffer passed by the MTD >> + * layer is not DMA-able >> + * @bouncebuf_size: size of the bounce buffe > ^buffer > >> * @info: spi-nor part JDEC MFR id and other info >> * @page_size: the page size of the SPI NOR >> * @addr_width: number of address bytes >> @@ -380,6 +385,9 @@ struct spi_nor { >> struct mtd_info mtd; >> struct mutex lock; >> struct device *dev; >> + struct spi_mem *spimem; >> + void *bouncebuf; >> + unsigned int bouncebuf_size; > > size_t? > > Please run checkpatch --strict over the patch, there are few things to fix. > I will address all except for the ones reported for spi_nor_dev_ids[] as they existed before so that alignment looks good. > Do you think it is worth documenting the new functions? > Will add at places where functions are not trivial. Thanks for the review! -- Regards Vignesh ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/