Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: mtd: Add YAML schemas for the generic NAND options

[Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:19 AM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Maxime,
>
> Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Mon,  1 Apr 2019
> 23:13:53 +0200:
>
> > The NAND chips in MTD have a bunch of generic options that are needed in a
> > device tree. Add a YAML schemas for those.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand-controller.yaml | 131 +++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 131 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand-controller.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand-controller.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..05b1afb34972
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand-controller.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mtd/nand-controller.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: NAND Chip and NAND Controller Generic Binding
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > +  - Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Unfortunately Boris is leaving.
>
> > +  - Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > +  - Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
>
> Is this really needed? There is already a section for that purpose in
> MAINTAINERS.

Yes, because MAINTAINERS is a kernel file and bindings are somewhat
independent. And I found most binding files don't have a maintainer
(other than me as default).

If we ever go to per subsystem/directory MAiNTAiNERS files, then we
can easily generate one from bindings for the kernel.

Rob

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/