Hi Helmut, > -----Original Message----- > From: Helmut Grohne <helmut.grohne@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 5:21 PM > To: Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: bbrezillon@xxxxxxxxxx; miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx; richard@xxxxxx; > dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; computersforpeace@xxxxxxxxx; marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx; linux- > mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Michal Simek <michals@xxxxxxxxxx>; > nagasureshkumarrelli@xxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [LINUX PATCH v13] rawnand: pl353: Add basic driver for arm pl353 smc nand > interface > > Hi Naga, > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 09:13:59AM +0000, Naga Sureshkumar Relli wrote: > > It's a on-die ECC capable device. Did u mentioned nand-ecc-mode = "on-die" in dts. > > The same part I tested by mentioning "on-die" property in dts and it worked for me. > > Please share the dts entries for NAND. > > Also if it is x8 bus then please mention nand-bus-width = <8>; If it > > is x16 mention nand-bus-width = <16>; > > Thank you for pointing at the relevant properties. Indeed, these were missing in my previous > tests. I am now using the following dt (generated from multiple fragments, giving the > decompiled dt here): > > | memory-controller@e000e000 { > | #address-cells = <0x2>; > | #size-cells = <0x1>; > | status = "okay"; > | clock-names = "memclk", "apb_pclk"; > | clocks = <0x1 0xb 0x1 0x2c>; > | compatible = "arm,pl353-smc-r2p1", "arm,primecell"; > | interrupt-parent = <0x4>; > | interrupts = <0x0 0x12 0x4>; > | ranges = <0x0 0x0 0xe1000000 0x1000000>; > | reg = <0xe000e000 0x1000>; > | > | flash@e1000000 { > | status = "okay"; > | compatible = "arm,pl353-nand-r2p1"; > | reg = <0x0 0x0 0x1000000>; > | #address-cells = <0x1>; > | #size-cells = <0x1>; > | nand-ecc-mode = "on-die"; > | nand-ecc-algo = "hamming"; > | nand-bus-width = <0x8>; > | }; > | }; > > With this dt, the device is successfully initialized and the data read is mostly intact. When > using it with jffs2, I get loads of ECC errors though (offsets and lengths vary): > > | jffs2: mtd->read(0x800 bytes from 0xb60000) returned ECC error > > Reverting back to the out-of-tree driver (4.14), it works normally, so a hardware defect seems > unlikely. I compared a register dump of the smc between those drivers and the only difference I > could find was NAND timings (at 0xE000E180), which are much lower with the new drivers > as it does not consume the arm,nand-cycle-* properties that the old driver consumed. I tried > hard coding the previous timings, but the ECC errors persist. This leads me to conclude that > timings are not the cause for what I am seeing. > > Is there anything else I can try to diagnose it? Thanks for trying with new dts. Previously we will pass the nand-cycle-* through dts. But now framework is giving all the timing information of SDR. So we will just configure those Timings. I will recheck the driver about the timings. Till now I tried mtd-utils(mtd-debug) and ubifs. I haven't tried jffs2. Let me give a try and will let you know. Thanks, Naga Sureshkumar Relli. > > Helmut ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/