Re: mtd: mchp23k256: How to follow a more generic approach?

[Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 20.02.19 08:52, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 14:47:08 +0000
> Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>>    
>>>> The instructions seem to be very similar to EEPROM and SPI NOR devices.
>>>> So I'm curious about what others propose how to support these devices.
>>>
>>> I'm planning to write the driver for the ANV32AA1W during the next weeks
>>> and it would be really great to have some feedback on the approach here.
>>
>> Maybe you can create a new generic SPI RAM driver (I don't think
>> something like this exists yet), that can be used with things like SRAM,
>> nvSRAM, FRAM, etc.?
> 
> Creating a new framework makes sense if you have enough to share
> between all those drivers. I might be wrong (didn't look at the code)
> but I think SRAM devices are simple enough to not require a new
> mid-layer (especially if they use a different cmdset). What we could do
> though is group them in drivers/mtd/sram/.

It's just that it seems they are using a common basic command set (at 
least the ones that I have looked at) which seems to consist of READ 
(0x03), WRITE (0x02), READ_STATUS (0x05), WRITE_STATUS (0x01).
Some of them might provide additional commands for write protection or 
dual/quad access.
So I wouldn't consider it a "framework", but more a generic driver that 
supports this basic command set to connect to all of those chips.

> 
>>
>> At the time when a generic driver exists, we could use it to replace the
>> mchp23k256 driver.
>>
>> If you write a new driver or convert an existing one to support the
>> nvSRAM chips, please use the SPI MEM interface (drivers/spi/spi-mem.c).
>> This would enable us to share some code and connect those chips to all
>> kinds of controllers that support this interface (which are not only
>> generic SPI controllers, but also some QSPI controllers, that don't
>> support generic SPI transfers).
> 
> Yes, please use the spi-mem layer (note that I already started the
> conversion of at25 here [1]).
> 
> [1]https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg1904223.html
> 
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/