On 10/02/19 6:49 PM, Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 11:43:46 +0530 > Vignesh R <vigneshr@xxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> static int cqspi_setup_flash(struct cqspi_st *cqspi, struct device_node *np) >>>> { >>>> - const struct spi_nor_hwcaps hwcaps = { >>>> - .mask = SNOR_HWCAPS_READ | >>>> - SNOR_HWCAPS_READ_FAST | >>>> - SNOR_HWCAPS_READ_1_1_2 | >>>> - SNOR_HWCAPS_READ_1_1_4 | >>>> - SNOR_HWCAPS_PP, >>>> - }; >>>> struct platform_device *pdev = cqspi->pdev; >>>> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; >>>> + const struct cqspi_driver_platdata *ddata; >>>> + struct spi_nor_hwcaps hwcaps; >>>> struct cqspi_flash_pdata *f_pdata; >>>> struct spi_nor *nor; >>>> struct mtd_info *mtd; >>>> unsigned int cs; >>>> int i, ret; >>>> >>>> + ddata = of_device_get_match_data(dev); >>>> + if (!ddata) >>>> + hwcaps.mask = CQSPI_BASE_HWCAPS_MASK; >>> >>> Now that .data is set in all cqspi_dt_ids[], maybe it's better to print a >>> message and return an error here. But I guess it's a matter of taste, so not a >>> show stopper. >> >> Since, driver data is kernel internal field, I guess there is little >> help in printing out the error to the user when its missing. I prefer to >> keep this as is, as basic Quad mode is supported by all versions of the IP. > > Well, if all compat entries have an associated platdata instance we > don't need to support the !ddata case, right? I think enforcing the > presence of such a platdata is actually is a sane thing to do (which > implies returning an error when ddata is NULL). > Ok, will respin with a dev_err() and return -EINVAL when ddata is NULL. -- Regards Vignesh ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/