Hey Miquel,
On 2/5/19 6:55 AM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Gustavo,
>
> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Mon, 28 Jan
> 2019 12:15:20 -0600:
>
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
>> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> This patch fixes the following warning:
>>
>> drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:3264:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:3288:17: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c:5538:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c:5557:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c:5595:13: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_legacy.c:332:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_legacy.c:483:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c:2254:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c:512:4: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c:517:4: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c:466:37: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c:471:37: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c: In function ‘nuc900_nand_command_lp’:
>> ./arch/x86/include/asm/io.h:91:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> #define __raw_writel __writel
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c:52:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘__raw_writel’
>> __raw_writel((val), (dev)->reg + REG_SMCMD)
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c:196:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘write_cmd_reg’
>> write_cmd_reg(nand, NAND_CMD_READSTART);
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c:197:2: note: here
>> default:
>> ^~~~~~~
>>
>> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>>
>> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling
>> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Add extra /* fall through */ comment in nandsim.c file.
>>
>> drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c | 2 ++
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/diskonchip.c | 1 +
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c | 3 +++
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_legacy.c | 3 ++-
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c | 6 ++++--
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c | 3 ++-
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c | 4 ++++
>> 7 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c
>> index 4ca4b194e7d7..e9b71ad24f50 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c
>
> onenand changes should probably be in a separate patch prefixed
>
> mtd: onenand:
>
> When you are unsure, please run
>
> git log --oneline --follow drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/
>
OK. Got it.
>> @@ -3280,12 +3280,14 @@ static void onenand_check_features(struct mtd_info *mtd)
>> if ((this->version_id & 0xf) == 0xe)
>> this->options |= ONENAND_HAS_NOP_1;
>> }
>> + /* fall through */
>>
>> case ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_2Gb:
>> /* 2Gb DDP does not have 2 plane */
>> if (!ONENAND_IS_DDP(this))
>> this->options |= ONENAND_HAS_2PLANE;
>> this->options |= ONENAND_HAS_UNLOCK_ALL;
>> + /* fall through */
>
> This looks strange.
>
> In ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_2Gb:
> ONENAND_HAS_UNLOCK_ALL is set unconditionally.
>
> But then, under ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_1Gb, the same option is set only
> if process is evaluated to true.
>
> Same problem with ONENAND_HAS_2PLANE:
> - it is set in ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_4Gb only if ONENAND_IS_DDP()
> - it is unset in ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_2Gb only if !ONENAND_IS_DDP()
>
> Maybe this portion should be reworked because I am unsure if this is a
> missing fall through or a bug.
>
OK. Then, I should probably skip this file for now.
>>
>> case ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_1Gb:
>> /* A-Die has all block unlock */
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/diskonchip.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/diskonchip.c
>> index 53f57e0f007e..ead54c90f2d1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/diskonchip.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/diskonchip.c
>> @@ -1477,6 +1477,7 @@ static int __init doc_probe(unsigned long physadr)
>> break;
>> case DOC_ChipID_DocMilPlus32:
>> pr_err("DiskOnChip Millennium Plus 32MB is not supported, ignoring.\n");
>> + /* fall through */
>> default:
>> ret = -ENODEV;
>> goto notfound;
>
> This is fine.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
>> index 96cadead262e..e05ecf2e4269 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
>> @@ -5537,6 +5537,7 @@ static int nand_scan_tail(struct nand_chip *chip)
>> }
>> if (!ecc->read_page)
>> ecc->read_page = nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first;
>> + /* fall through */
>>
>> case NAND_ECC_HW:
>> /* Use standard hwecc read page function? */
>> @@ -5556,6 +5557,7 @@ static int nand_scan_tail(struct nand_chip *chip)
>> ecc->read_subpage = nand_read_subpage;
>> if (!ecc->write_subpage && ecc->hwctl && ecc->calculate)
>> ecc->write_subpage = nand_write_subpage_hwecc;
>> + /* fall through */
>>
>> case NAND_ECC_HW_SYNDROME:
>> if ((!ecc->calculate || !ecc->correct || !ecc->hwctl) &&
>> @@ -5593,6 +5595,7 @@ static int nand_scan_tail(struct nand_chip *chip)
>> ecc->size, mtd->writesize);
>> ecc->mode = NAND_ECC_SOFT;
>> ecc->algo = NAND_ECC_HAMMING;
>> + /* fall through */
>>
>> case NAND_ECC_SOFT:
>> ret = nand_set_ecc_soft_ops(chip);
>
> These three already are in nand/next.
>
Great.
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_legacy.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_legacy.c
>> index 43575943f13b..f2526ec616a6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_legacy.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_legacy.c
>> @@ -331,6 +331,7 @@ static void nand_command(struct nand_chip *chip, unsigned int command,
>> */
>> if (column == -1 && page_addr == -1)
>> return;
>> + /* fall through */
>>
>> default:
>> /*
>> @@ -483,7 +484,7 @@ static void nand_command_lp(struct nand_chip *chip, unsigned int command,
>> chip->legacy.cmd_ctrl(chip, NAND_CMD_NONE,
>> NAND_NCE | NAND_CTRL_CHANGE);
>>
>> - /* This applies to read commands */
>> + /* fall through - This applies to read commands */
>> default:
>> /*
>> * If we don't have access to the busy pin, we apply the given
>
> Already fixed in nand/next too.
>
OK. Great.
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c
>> index 933d1a629c51..edf5fd3d5f07 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c
>> @@ -2251,9 +2251,11 @@ static int __init ns_init_module(void)
>>
>> switch (bbt) {
>> case 2:
>> - chip->bbt_options |= NAND_BBT_NO_OOB;
>> + chip->bbt_options |= NAND_BBT_NO_OOB;
>> + /* fall through */
>> case 1:
>> - chip->bbt_options |= NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH;
>> + chip->bbt_options |= NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH;
>> + /* fall through */
>> case 0:
>> break;
>> default:
>
> This is fine.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c
>> index 38b1994e7ed3..56fa84029482 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c
>> @@ -192,8 +192,9 @@ static void nuc900_nand_command_lp(struct nand_chip *chip,
>> return;
>>
>> case NAND_CMD_READ0:
>> -
>> write_cmd_reg(nand, NAND_CMD_READSTART);
>> + /* fall through */
>> +
>> default:
>>
>> if (!chip->legacy.dev_ready) {
>
> This is fine too.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c
>> index a3f32f939cc1..94c6401ef32f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c
>> @@ -465,11 +465,13 @@ static int elm_context_save(struct elm_info *info)
>> ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_5 + offset);
>> regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_4[i] = elm_read_reg(info,
>> ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_4 + offset);
>> + /* fall through */
>> case BCH8_ECC:
>> regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_3[i] = elm_read_reg(info,
>> ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_3 + offset);
>> regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_2[i] = elm_read_reg(info,
>> ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_2 + offset);
>> + /* fall through */
>> case BCH4_ECC:
>> regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_1[i] = elm_read_reg(info,
>> ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_1 + offset);
>> @@ -511,11 +513,13 @@ static int elm_context_restore(struct elm_info *info)
>> regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_5[i]);
>> elm_write_reg(info, ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_4 + offset,
>> regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_4[i]);
>> + /* fall through */
>> case BCH8_ECC:
>> elm_write_reg(info, ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_3 + offset,
>> regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_3[i]);
>> elm_write_reg(info, ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_2 + offset,
>> regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_2[i]);
>> + /* fall through */
>> case BCH4_ECC:
>> elm_write_reg(info, ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_1 + offset,
>> regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_1[i]);
>
> And this is ok as well.
>
I'll leave out the files that have already been addressed and send v3 shortly.
I appreciate your feedback.
Thanks
--
Gustavo
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: mark expected switch fall-throughs
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: mark expected switch fall-throughs
- From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 11:11:59 -0600
- Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@xxxxxxxxx>, Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@xxxxxxxxxx>, Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx>, Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Brian Norris <computersforpeace@xxxxxxxxx>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20190205135521.622f82c2@xps13>
- Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
- References: <20190128181520.GA25887@embeddedor> <20190205135521.622f82c2@xps13>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0
- References:
- [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: mark expected switch fall-throughs
- From: Gustavo A. R. Silva
- Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: mark expected switch fall-throughs
- From: Miquel Raynal
- [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: mark expected switch fall-throughs
- Prev by Date: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: spi-nor: Fix wrong abbreviation HWCPAS
- Next by Date: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: spi-nor: Fix wrong abbreviation HWCPAS
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: mark expected switch fall-throughs
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: mark expected switch fall-throughs
- Index(es):
 |