On Fri, 2019-02-08 at 17:08 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Use 'bool' type for some function arguments. > > - write (write or read?) > - raw (the raw access mode or not?) > > It is true that denali_nand_info::dma_avail is also boolean, but > I am keeping it as 'int' because 'scripts/checkpatch --strict' would > report the following: > > CHECK: Avoid using bool structure members because of possible alignment issues > - see: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/21/384 > > I do not think it is a matter here, but I am sticking to the suggestion. just fyi: that suggestion has been removed by: commit 7967656ffbfa493f5546c0f18bf8a28f702c4baa Author: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx> Date: Fri Jan 18 15:50:47 2019 -0700 coding-style: Clarify the expectations around bool There has been some confusion since checkpatch started warning about bool use in structures, and people have been avoiding using it. Many people feel there is still a legitimate place for bool in structures, so provide some guidance on bool usage derived from the entire thread that spawned the checkpatch warning. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFwVZk1OfB9T2v014PTAKFhtVan_Zj2dOjnCy3x ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/