On 2/5/19 7:18 AM, Miquel Raynal wrote: > Hi Dinh, > > Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Thu, 31 Jan 2019 > 18:26:44 +0100: > >> Hi Dinh, >> >> On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 11:24:16 -0600 >> Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> On 1/28/19 4:20 AM, Miquel Raynal wrote: >>>> Hi Dinh, >>>> >>>> Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Wed, 16 Jan >>>> 2019 10:27:11 +0900: >>>> >>>>> (+CC Dinh Nguyen) >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 5:22 PM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Masahiro, >>>>>> >>>>>> Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Tue, 15 Jan >>>>>> 2019 17:11:34 +0900: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Commit 6f1fe97bec34 ("mtd: rawnand: denali_dt: add more clocks based >>>>>>> on IP datasheet") introduced a more correct binding that requires >>>>>>> three named clocks. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Now that all upstream DT files migrated over to it, remove the single >>>>>>> anonymous clock support. >>>>>> >>>>>> I would love to do that but I think this is against the "DT backward >>>>>> compatibility rule". >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, I know this rule, but we break DT binding from time to time. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Anyway, IIRC it is accepted that this kind of >>>>>> rule might be broken if decided per the arch-maintainer (in this >>>>>> case, you I suppose). So if this is really what you want, I'll queue >>>>>> it. >>>>> >>>>> My platform is fine, but this driver is used by SOCFPGA boards as well. >>>>> >>>>> I CCed the SOCFPGA maintainer, Dinh Nguyen. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Gentle ping on this topic. >>>> >>> >>> This patch looks fine to be. Feel free to add: >>> >>> Tested-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> I think Miquel is waiting for an Acked-by to confirm that you're okay >> breaking backward compat with old DT. > > Yes, I am waiting for your Acked-by. > > Acked-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@xxxxxxxxxx> Dinh ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/