Re: [PATCH v4 13/13] spi: atmel-quadspi: add support for sam9x60 qspi controller

[<Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 02/04/2019 04:16 PM, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 10:10:21 +0000
> <Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> +
>> +static void atmel_qspi_sam9x60_write_regs(const struct atmel_qspi *aq,
>> +					  const struct spi_mem_op *op,
>> +					  const struct atmel_qspi_cfg *cfg)
>> +{
>> +	/* Clear pending interrupts */
>> +	(void)readl_relaxed(aq->regs + QSPI_SR);
>> +
>> +	/* Set QSPI Instruction Frame registers */
>> +	writel_relaxed(cfg->iar, aq->regs + QSPI_IAR);
>> +	if (op->data.dir == SPI_MEM_DATA_IN)
>> +		writel_relaxed(cfg->icr, aq->regs + QSPI_RICR);
>> +	else
>> +		writel_relaxed(cfg->icr, aq->regs + QSPI_ICR);
> 
> Can you use WICR here (even if ICR == WICR)?

yes, good catch.
> 
>> +	writel_relaxed(cfg->ifr, aq->regs + QSPI_IFR);
>> +}
> 
> Hm, so the only difference we have is the RICR vs ICR reg and the
> APBTFRTYP_READ vs SAMA5D2_WRITE_TRSFR bit. Not sure it deserves
> creating 2 hooks for that. Can we have something like ->has_ricr in
> the caps and then have an if/else block directly in
> atmel_qspi_set_cfg()?
> 

Correct. It is a cost of an extra if, I tried to avoid it. I like it better with
these two hooks, but if you have a strong opinion I'll do it, just confirm it again.

Thanks,
ta
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/