Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] mtd: rawnand: jz4780-bch: Add support for the JZ4740

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Le dim. 3 févr. 2019 à 11:16, Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
On Sun, 03 Feb 2019 10:58:13 -0300
Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Le dim. 3 févr. 2019 à 4:35, Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@xxxxxxxxxx>
 a écrit :
 > On Sat,  2 Feb 2019 20:19:26 -0300
 > Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 >
>> Add the backend code for the jz4780-bch driver to support the JZ4740
 >>  SoC from Ingenic.
 >>
 >>  Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 >>  ---
 >>
 >>  Changes:
 >>
 >>  v2: New patch
 >>
 >>   drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Makefile         |   2 +-
 >>   drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/jz4740_bch.c     | 173
 >> ++++++++++++++++++
 >>   .../mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/jz4780_bch_common.c  |   1 +
 >>   .../nand/raw/ingenic/jz4780_bch_internal.h    |   1 +
 >>   4 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 >>   create mode 100644 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/jz4740_bch.c
 >>
 >>  diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Makefile
 >> b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Makefile
 >>  index f38b467490cf..d16c96113a93 100644
 >>  --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Makefile
 >>  +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Makefile
 >>  @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 >>   obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_JZ4740) += jz4740_nand.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_JZ4780) += jz4780_nand.o jz4780_bch_common.o
 >> \
 >>  -				 jz4780_bch.o jz4725b_bch.o
 >>  +				 jz4780_bch.o jz4725b_bch.o jz4740_bch.o
 >
 > I still don't see the point of the jz4780_bch_common/jz47xxx_bch
> separation. You seem to always embed all objects anyway, so you can > just put the code for both engines in the same source file and decide > which one to use based on the compat (which you already do anyway).

Each SoC has a different set of registers for the BCH hardware. I can
 try to
 cram everything into one file, but it won't be that much cleaner.

Then maybe they deserve separate drivers/modules.

BTW, didn't you say that one IP uses Reed-Salomon instead of BCH. I'd
suggest prefixing structs and functions with jz47xx_ecc instead of
jz47xx_bch and naming the common part jz47xx_ecc.c to reflect that.

Would it be a good idea to make a generic ECC API that the jz47xx_nand
driver could use? Then the three jz47xx BCH codepaths could be separate
drivers that register with the generic ECC core.


______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/




[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux