Hi Boris, On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 6:15 PM Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Masahiro, > > On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 17:23:28 +0900 > Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > > > Many hooks in nand_ecc_ctrl, such as read_page, write_page, etc. > > look controller-specific instead of per-chip. > > > > Will they be moved to nand_controller_op or somewhere > > in the future? > > Not exactly :-). I don't know if I should say it, but Miquel is working > on a generic NAND ECC engine framework which we'll try to re-use at the > raw NAND layer. The idea is to dissociate the ECC engine concept from > the NAND controller one. I imagine something like this: > > ecc_engine->prepare_page_io_req(nand, ioreq); > nand_controller->do_page_io(nand, ioreq); > ecc_engine->finish_page_io_req(nand, ioreq); > > If we go for this approach, the nand controller should only have one > hook: ->do_page_io(), and this hook would indeed be placed in > nand_controller_ops. Once we have that in place, we can deprecate the > ecc field in nand_chip (by moving it to nand_legacy). Fascinating. It is good to know you are planning a better HW modeling. Thanks for explanation! > Of course, this implies making the raw NAND framework use the generic > NAND layer (which I started to work on here [1]). > > > > > Boris and Miquel are doing a great job > > for the NAND framework improvement. > > Thanks. > > > So, maybe it is already in their TODO list. > > It is, but, given the amount of work needed, it's unlikely to pop up in > a near future. > > Regards, > > Boris > > [1]https://github.com/bbrezillon/linux/commits/nand/cleanup > > ______________________________________________________ > Linux MTD discussion mailing list > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/ -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/