The new exec_op() scheme takes advantage of union in order to store instruction private data, which is mutually exclusive. I felt a bit annoyed with the long accessors. At least, we can omit "ctx." by making the union anonymous. I converted nand_op_instr and nand_op_parser_pattern_elem. I still see more instances, e.g. struct nand_op_data_instr { unsigned int len; union { void *in; const void *out; } buf; bool force_8bit; }; We could convert this into: struct nand_op_data_instr { unsigned int len; union { void *ibuf; const void *obuf; }; bool force_8bit; }; Or, if we want to match the struct to NAND_OP_*_INSTR, we can split it into two structures. struct nand_op_data_in_instr { unsigned int len; void *buf; bool force_8bit; }; struct nand_op_data_out_instr { unsigned int len; const void *buf; bool force_8bit; }; Anyway, let's see if people are positive about this shortning. Masahiro Yamada (2): mtd: rawnand: use unnamed union in struct nand_op_instr mtd: rawnand: use unnamed union in struct nand_op_parser_pattern_elem drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ams-delta.c | 18 +++++------ drivers/mtd/nand/raw/fsmc_nand.c | 41 +++++++++++------------- drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c | 16 +++++----- drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++------------------- drivers/mtd/nand/raw/tegra_nand.c | 10 +++--- drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c | 14 ++++---- include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h | 36 ++++++++++----------- 7 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-) -- 2.7.4 ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/