+Miquel Kenneth, please Cc the NAND maintainers next time. On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 09:53:02 +0100 Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Richard, > > On Thu, 03 Jan 2019 21:43:13 +0100 > Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > It's true that you could change the vid offset with ubiattach but that > > > require you know that the LEB missmatch error you get is fixed by a > > > different vid offset and you need to understand what that value should be. > > > This way you only need to match the basic mtd parameters and the rest > > > will just work automatically. > > > > I agree that adding a parameter to nandsim to control subpage behavior > > is nice. > > But please keep in mind that nandsim will never perfectly match your hardware. > > > > Boris, unless you have objections I'm fine to control NAND_NO_SUBPAGE_WRITE > > in nandsim using a module parameter. > > Hm, I'd really like to have nandsim replaced by something more generic > at some point (mtdsim or MTD/NAND emulation in qemu using a virtio > iface), so adding new features/option to this driver is something I'd > like to avoid. This being said, this new MTD/NAND emulation > infrastructure is not there yet, and I don't think I'll have time to > work on it (I started working on mtdsim a while back, and someone took > over this work, but it stopped at some point). > > To sum-up, if you think this is absolutely necessary (given the > discussion I'm not convinced it is) I'm okay to add this module param, > but I'd prefer if people were working on a solution to replace all > those emulation layers we have right now (mtdram, nandsim, ...). > > Regards, > > Boris ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/