Hi all, When using the typical and well-known approach for atomic file updates: fd = open(“foo.new”, O_WRONLY); write(fd, buf, bufsize); fsync(fd); close(fd); rename(“foo.new”, “foo”); And assuming that we want to ensure not only that the update was atomic, but also that the "new" version of the file will be available in the event of a crash, normally one would also fsync the parent directory. Is this needed in UBIFS? The reason I am asking is this snippet from the online documentation: > fsync() may be called for directories - it synchronizes the directory inode meta-data. [...] > The fdatasync() call for directories is "no-op" in UBIFS and all UBIFS operations which change directory entries are synchronous. If I am reading correctly, the latter ("all UBIFS operations which change directory entries are synchronous") seems to imply that calling fsync on the parent dir would not be necessary. However my tests seem to indicate otherwise. Am I misreading the docs? Thank you, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia guille.rodriguez@xxxxxxxxx ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/