On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 18:15:34 +0000 "Sverdlin, Alexander (Nokia - DE/Ulm)" <alexander.sverdlin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > JESD216 allows "variable address length" and "variable latency" in > Configuration Detection Command Descriptors, in other words "as-is". > And they are still unset during Sector Map Parameter Table parsing, > which led to "map_id" determined erroneously as 0 for, e.g. S25FS128S. > > Fixes: b038e8e3b ("mtd: spi-nor: parse SFDP Sector Map Parameter Table") > Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c > index 828d03e..5557c89 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c > @@ -2893,6 +2893,16 @@ static const u32 *spi_nor_get_map_in_use(struct spi_nor *nor, const u32 *smpt) > nor->read_opcode = SMPT_CMD_OPCODE(smpt[i]); > addr = smpt[i + 1]; > > + /* > + * JESD216 allows to omit particular address length or latency > + * specification in the header and at this point they are still > + * unset, so we need some heuristics. One example is S25FS128S. > + */ > + if (!nor->addr_width) > + nor->addr_width = 3; > + if (!nor->read_dummy) > + nor->read_dummy = 8; > + Looks like the same problem was reported by Yogesh here [1]. One more proof that parsing SFDP is not trivial. I mean, what's the point of defining a generic tables to describe NOR capabilities if you then depend on vendor/chip specific init to read those tables... Anyway, I think this sort of initialization should be placed in a pre_sfdp() fixup hook, as getting the right values likely requires reading some volatile/non-volatile regs. > err = spi_nor_read_raw(nor, addr, 1, &data_byte); > if (err) > goto out; [1]https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/22/354 ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/