niedz., 18 lis 2018 o 17:03 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a): > > On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 15:01:08 +0100 > Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > As far as merging of this series goes: I'd like to avoid dragging it over > > four releases. The series is logically split into five groups: > > > > patches 1-2: nvmem and mtd changes > > patches 3-9: davinci arch-specific changes > > patches 10-13: networking changes > > patches 14-24: davinci specific again > > patch 25: final at24 change > > > > With that I believe we can do the following: Greg KH could pick up the > > first two patches into his char-misc tree. > > The char-misc tree? Why not the MTD or NVMEM tree? > There is no NVMEM tree - Srinivas sends his patches to Greg to be applied to char-misc. The second patch depends on the first one so in order to avoid more merging problems I suggested that the MTD patch go through char-misc as well. If you see a better solution, please let me know. Bart ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/