Hi Huijin, On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 04:43:39 -0400 Huijin Park <huijin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: "huijin.park" <huijin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > assign of a signed value which has type 'int' to a variable of > a bigger unsigned integer type 'uint64_t'. Why are you mentioning u64? AFAICT, the len passed to erase_write() is always an unsigned int. > this is ok most of the time, but can lead to unexpectedly large > resulting value if the original signed value is negative. > in addtion, the callers of the erase_write() pass the len parameter ^In addition, > as unsigned type. > > Signed-off-by: huijin.park <huijin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/mtd/mtdblock.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdblock.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdblock.c > index a5b1933..b2d5ed1 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/mtdblock.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdblock.c > @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ struct mtdblk_dev { > */ > > static int erase_write (struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned long pos, > - int len, const char *buf) > + unsigned int len, const char *buf) The diff looks good, but the commit message is not clear at all. Can you reword it? Thanks, Boris > { > struct erase_info erase; > size_t retlen; ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/