Re: [PATCH 06/15] mtd: rawnand: Add nand_[de]select_target() helpers

[Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Mon, 29 Oct 2018
14:57:27 +0100:

> On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 14:39:24 +0100
> Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Mon, 29 Oct 2018
> > 14:36:47 +0100:
> >   
> > > Hi Boris,
> > > 
> > > Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Tue, 23 Oct 2018
> > > 20:50:02 +0200:
> > >     
> > > > Add a wrapper to prevent drivers and core code from directly calling
> > > > the ->select_chip hook which we are about to deprecate.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c |  23 +++--
> > > >  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/jz4740_nand.c         |   4 +-
> > > >  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c           | 114 ++++++++++++++-------
> > > >  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/r852.c                |   4 +-
> > > >  include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h                |   4 +
> > > >  5 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
> > > >       
> > > 
> > > So far I am glad to see all these changes.
> > > 
> > > About the ->select_chip() removal, I wonder if it would not be better
> > > to also change the local variables "chipnr" or "chip_number" (or
> > > even "i") that suggest that this ID selects a chip, while it
> > > actually selects a die in a chip (and it is possible to have multiple
> > > die on a chip, so multiple CS for one single NAND chip).  
> 
> I agree.
> 
> > > 
> > > Do you think it is worth the change ? If yes, would it fit in this patch
> > > or is it better to do this change elsewhere?
> > >     
> > 
> > This request actually applies to the following patches as well. Maybe we
> > could even find a uniform way to name it, "die_nr" or something like
> > this?  
> 
> Target is the name used in the ONFI spec, hence the function names.
> Note that die is not accurate since you might have several dies exposed
> through a single CS line (that's called LUNs).

I'm completely fine with the rename of the functions being now
<nfc>_select_target().

What about renaming local variables -when relevant- as lun_nr? lun?
lun_idx?

Do you think it should be done in place in these patches or as a
separate change?


Thanks,
Miquèl

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/