Hi Michael, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Mon, 29 Oct 2018 10:43:05 +0100: > Hi > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 10:41 AM Miquel Raynal > <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi Michael, > > > > Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on > > Fri, 5 Oct 2018 12:32:18 +0200: > > > > > Hi Boris > > > > > > I have reverted for now > > > > > > Revert "mtd: rawnand: gpmi: support ->setup_data_interface()" > > > This reverts commit 76e1a0086a0c3276b384f77905345e0fcc886fdd. > > > > > > Revert "mtd: rawnand: gpmi: use core timings instead of an empirical > > > derivation" > > > This reverts commit b1206122069aadabe1a8c50789277a978aaa4df7. > > > > Sorry for the delay, I've been very busy lately. > > > > Please also Cc: me in your e-mails to the MTD ML. > > > > AFAIR I'm the author of these patches so I would like to understand and > > fix what's wrong there. As a start, can you discriminate which patch > > actually makes the timings inconsistent? Are you ready to do more > > testing to find what's wrong? > > Yes it's on my plan. Now for field I need to revert them but I have > them in roadmap. > We are testing now an imx6dl. It can be a combination with the micron > part number too. Sure, let us know about your discoveries, I really want the GPMI driver to use core timings and ->setup_data_interface() so if there is something wrong there it should be fixed. Thanks, Miquèl ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/