On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 09:11:55AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: > I fredags, den 21 september 2018, 15:53:42 CEST skrev Greg KH: > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 11:33:15AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > >> Greg, > >> > >> The following changes since commit ae596de1a0c8c2c924dc99d23c026259372ab234: > >> > >> Compiler Attributes: naked can be shared (2018-09-20 15:23:58 +0200) > > > > Wow, bold move, new patches with less than 24 hours in your tree. That > > means linux-next didn't see them :( > > > >> are available in the Git repository at: > >> > >> git://git.infradead.org/linux-ubifs.git tags/upstream-4.19-rc4 > > > > Now pulled, but really, don't you think that they should at least go > > through 0-day first? Maybe no one runs ubifs on mainline kernels... > > FWIW, we do... That's good to know. I was just trying to say that patches asked to be pulled in, less than 24 hours from when they were added to the developer's tree, is usually a little "suspect" as they normally have not had the chance to go through our "CI" systems. That's all, I wasn't trying to disparage the UBIFS codebase at all :) thanks, greg k-h ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/