Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: nand: reorder nand manufacturer ids

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu,  6 Sep 2018 10:49:21 +0200
Marcel Ziswiler <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Reorder NAND manufacturer ids for clarity.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ---
> 
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_ids.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
>  include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h     |  8 ++++----
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_ids.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_ids.c
> index 5423c3bb388e..0851cd86bf19 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_ids.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_ids.c
> @@ -169,21 +169,21 @@ struct nand_flash_dev nand_flash_ids[] = {
>  
>  /* Manufacturer IDs */
>  static const struct nand_manufacturer nand_manufacturers[] = {
> -	{NAND_MFR_TOSHIBA, "Toshiba", &toshiba_nand_manuf_ops},
> +	{NAND_MFR_AMD, "AMD/Spansion", &amd_nand_manuf_ops},
> +	{NAND_MFR_ATO, "ATO"},
> +	{NAND_MFR_EON, "Eon"},
>  	{NAND_MFR_ESMT, "ESMT"},
> -	{NAND_MFR_SAMSUNG, "Samsung", &samsung_nand_manuf_ops},
>  	{NAND_MFR_FUJITSU, "Fujitsu"},
> -	{NAND_MFR_NATIONAL, "National"},
> -	{NAND_MFR_RENESAS, "Renesas"},
> -	{NAND_MFR_STMICRO, "ST Micro"},
>  	{NAND_MFR_HYNIX, "Hynix", &hynix_nand_manuf_ops},
> -	{NAND_MFR_MICRON, "Micron", &micron_nand_manuf_ops},
> -	{NAND_MFR_AMD, "AMD/Spansion", &amd_nand_manuf_ops},
> +	{NAND_MFR_INTEL, "Intel"},
>  	{NAND_MFR_MACRONIX, "Macronix", &macronix_nand_manuf_ops},
> -	{NAND_MFR_EON, "Eon"},
> +	{NAND_MFR_MICRON, "Micron", &micron_nand_manuf_ops},
> +	{NAND_MFR_NATIONAL, "National"},
> +	{NAND_MFR_RENESAS, "Renesas"},
> +	{NAND_MFR_SAMSUNG, "Samsung", &samsung_nand_manuf_ops},
>  	{NAND_MFR_SANDISK, "SanDisk"},
> -	{NAND_MFR_INTEL, "Intel"},
> -	{NAND_MFR_ATO, "ATO"},
> +	{NAND_MFR_STMICRO, "ST Micro"},
> +	{NAND_MFR_TOSHIBA, "Toshiba", &toshiba_nand_manuf_ops},
>  	{NAND_MFR_WINBOND, "Winbond"},
>  };
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h
> index efb2345359bb..ca134851d211 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h
> @@ -1541,12 +1541,12 @@ nand_manufacturer_name(const struct nand_manufacturer *manufacturer)
>  
>  extern struct nand_flash_dev nand_flash_ids[];
>  
> -extern const struct nand_manufacturer_ops toshiba_nand_manuf_ops;
> -extern const struct nand_manufacturer_ops samsung_nand_manuf_ops;
> -extern const struct nand_manufacturer_ops hynix_nand_manuf_ops;
> -extern const struct nand_manufacturer_ops micron_nand_manuf_ops;
>  extern const struct nand_manufacturer_ops amd_nand_manuf_ops;
> +extern const struct nand_manufacturer_ops hynix_nand_manuf_ops;
>  extern const struct nand_manufacturer_ops macronix_nand_manuf_ops;
> +extern const struct nand_manufacturer_ops micron_nand_manuf_ops;
> +extern const struct nand_manufacturer_ops samsung_nand_manuf_ops;
> +extern const struct nand_manufacturer_ops toshiba_nand_manuf_ops;

I'm okay with this kind of alphabetic reordering, but why not
reordering the macro definitions too?

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/



[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux