Re: [PATCH 14/25] ubifs: Add authentication nodes to journal

[Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 04:54:30PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 29. August 2018, 16:38:34 CEST schrieb Sascha Hauer:
> > On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 10:48:26PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > > >  	release_head(c, BASEHD);
> > > >  	kfree(dent);
> > > > +	ubifs_add_dirt(c, lnum, ubifs_auth_node_sz(c));
> > > 
> > > You have to account it immediately because while a commit you have no longer
> > > a reference to them?
> > > Upon replay you should have since you scan LEBs anyway.
> > 
> > What do you mean here? Is that a suggestion to change something?
> 
> I don't fully understand how you keep the lprops dirty counter correct for
> auth nodes. Hence the question.
> 
> Auth nodes are not referenced by the index, so you have to keep track of
> them manually.

Yes. That's why I call ubifs_add_dirt(c, lnum, ubifs_auth_node_sz(c))
each time I create an auth node.

> Is your current approach "mark them dirty immediately and rely on LPT commit"
> to not get lost of an auth node?

Yes, I mark the auth nodes dirty in the assumption that the correct
values are written on a LPT commit.

> 
> I expected auth nodes getting dirtied also during journal reply.

Yes, this happens in replay.c replay_bud(). "used" gets increased with
every node found except when it's an auth node. Here "used" is not
increased, the result is that the auth node adds to the dirty space.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/