On Thu, 2018-07-26 at 08:49 +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote: > Hi xiaolei, > > xiaolei li <xiaolei.li at mediatek.com> wrote on Thu, 26 Jul 2018 14:46:29 > +0800: > > > On Thu, 2018-07-26 at 08:14 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 14:06:41 +0800 > > > xiaolei li <xiaolei.li at mediatek.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Sat, 2018-07-21 at 19:10 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 17:15:06 +0200 > > > > > Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal at bootlin.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Two helpers have been added to the core to make ECC-related > > > > > > configuration between the detection phase and the final NAND scan. Use > > > > > > these hooks and convert the driver to just use nand_scan() instead of > > > > > > both nand_scan_ident() and nand_scan_tail(). > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal at bootlin.com> > > > > > > --- > > > > > > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- > > > > > > 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c > > > > > > index 7bc6be3f6ec0..967418f945ea 100644 > > > > > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c > > > > > > @@ -1250,13 +1250,54 @@ static int mtk_nfc_ecc_init(struct device *dev, struct mtd_info *mtd) > > > > > > return 0; > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > +static int mtk_nfc_attach_chip(struct nand_chip *chip) > > > > > > +{ > > > > > > + struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip); > > > > > > + struct device *dev = mtd->dev.parent; > > > > > > + struct mtk_nfc *nfc = nand_get_controller_data(chip); > > > > > > + struct mtk_nfc_nand_chip *mtk_nand = to_mtk_nand(chip); > > > > > > + int len; > > > > > > + int ret; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + if (chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16) { > > > > > > + dev_err(dev, "16bits buswidth not supported"); > > > > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > > > > + } > > > > > > + > > > > > > + /* store bbt magic in page, cause OOB is not protected */ > > > > > > + if (chip->bbt_options & NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH) > > > > > > + chip->bbt_options |= NAND_BBT_NO_OOB; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + ret = mtk_nfc_ecc_init(dev, mtd); > > > > > > + if (ret) > > > > > > + return ret; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + ret = mtk_nfc_set_spare_per_sector(&mtk_nand->spare_per_sector, mtd); > > > > > > + if (ret) > > > > > > + return ret; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + mtk_nfc_set_fdm(&mtk_nand->fdm, mtd); > > > > > > + mtk_nfc_set_bad_mark_ctl(&mtk_nand->bad_mark, mtd); > > > > > > + > > > > > > + len = mtd->writesize + mtd->oobsize; > > > > > > + nfc->buffer = devm_kzalloc(dev, len, GFP_KERNEL); > > > > > > + if (!nfc->buffer) > > > > > > + return -ENOMEM; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + return 0; > > > > > > +} > > > > > > + > > > > > > +static const struct nand_controller_ops mtk_nfc_controller_ops = { > > > > > > + .attach_chip = mtk_nfc_attach_chip, > > > > > > +}; > > > > > > + > > > > > > static int mtk_nfc_nand_chip_init(struct device *dev, struct mtk_nfc *nfc, > > > > > > struct device_node *np) > > > > > > { > > > > > > struct mtk_nfc_nand_chip *chip; > > > > > > struct nand_chip *nand; > > > > > > struct mtd_info *mtd; > > > > > > - int nsels, len; > > > > > > + int nsels; > > > > > > u32 tmp; > > > > > > int ret; > > > > > > int i; > > > > > > @@ -1287,6 +1328,7 @@ static int mtk_nfc_nand_chip_init(struct device *dev, struct mtk_nfc *nfc, > > > > > > > > > > > > nand = &chip->nand; > > > > > > nand->controller = &nfc->controller; > > > > > > + nand->controller->ops = &mtk_nfc_controller_ops; > > > > > > > > > > Just like for the marvell driver, this assignment should be moved here > > > > > [1]. > > > > Agree to this. > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, it looks like this driver is open-coding > > > > > nand_controller_init(), probably something we should fix (in a separate > > > > > patch). > > > > May I ask if you mean driver should use nand_hw_control_init helper to > > > > do controller_init? > > > > > > Well, now it's named nand_controller_init(), but yes, that's what I > > > meant. > > > > OK. I will fix it base on this patch series later. > > Nice! > > Then you can just wait for the next -rc1, this series should be > available. > OK. Thanks for your improvement! Assuming ->controller->ops assignment will be fixed, Acked-by: Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li at mediatek.com> > Thanks, > Miqu?l