[PATCH] mtd: rawnand: jz4740: Use the proper format specifier to print chipnr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all,

On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 23:11:56 +0200 Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal at bootlin.com> wrote:
>
> Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at bootlin.com> wrote on Thu, 19 Jul 2018
> 09:37:20 +0200:
> 
> > In jz_nand_detect_bank(), chipnr is a size_t argument. Use %zu instead
> > of %i when printing it.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr at canb.auug.org.au>
> > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at bootlin.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/jz4740_nand.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/jz4740_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/jz4740_nand.c
> > index 1f7aff04ad8a..9bb8a89e09f9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/jz4740_nand.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/jz4740_nand.c
> > @@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ static int jz_nand_detect_bank(struct platform_device *pdev,
> >  		mtd->size += chip->chipsize;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Found chip %i on bank %i\n", chipnr, bank);
> > +	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Found chip %zu on bank %i\n", chipnr, bank);
> >  	return 0;
> >  
> >  notfound_id:  
> 
> Applied to nand/next.

It might be a better fix to ask why chipnr is a size_t at all ... it is
only used as an index, so should probably be int ...

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/attachments/20180720/d2c2e81a/attachment.sig>


[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux