[PATCH v3 23/33] mtd: rawnand: txx9ndfmc: rename nand controller internal structure

[miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx (Miquel Raynal)]

As already done in the core, calling a struct nand_controller
'hw_control' is misleading. Use the same name as in nand_base.c:
'controller'.

Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal at bootlin.com>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/txx9ndfmc.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/txx9ndfmc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/txx9ndfmc.c
index 8f5bbbac4612..9019022774f7 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/txx9ndfmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/txx9ndfmc.c
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ struct txx9ndfmc_drvdata {
 	void __iomem *base;
 	unsigned char hold;	/* in gbusclock */
 	unsigned char spw;	/* in gbusclock */
-	struct nand_controller hw_control;
+	struct nand_controller controller;
 };
 
 static struct platform_device *mtd_to_platdev(struct mtd_info *mtd)
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ static int __init txx9ndfmc_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
 	dev_info(&dev->dev, "CLK:%ldMHz HOLD:%d SPW:%d\n",
 		 (gbusclk + 500000) / 1000000, hold, spw);
 
-	nand_controller_init(&drvdata->hw_control);
+	nand_controller_init(&drvdata->controller);
 
 	platform_set_drvdata(dev, drvdata);
 	txx9ndfmc_initialize(dev);
@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ static int __init txx9ndfmc_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
 		chip->ecc.bytes = 3;
 		chip->ecc.strength = 1;
 		chip->chip_delay = 100;
-		chip->controller = &drvdata->hw_control;
+		chip->controller = &drvdata->controller;
 
 		nand_set_controller_data(chip, txx9_priv);
 		txx9_priv->dev = dev;
-- 
2.14.1