On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 00:42:25 +0200 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at bootlin.com> wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 23:50:56 +0200 > Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal at bootlin.com> wrote: > > > In order to remove the limitation that forbids dynamic allocation in > > nand_scan_ident(), we must create a path that will be the same for all > > controller drivers. The idea is to use nand_scan() instead of the widely > > used nand_scan_ident()/nand_scan_tail() couple. In order to achieve > > this, controller drivers will need to adjust some parameters between > > these two functions depending on the NAND chip wired on them. > > > > For that, a hook called ->attach_chip() is created as part of the > > nand_controller_ops structure, itself embedded in the nand_controller > > structure. The later may be referenced by two ways: > > 1/ if the driver does not implement its own controller, the > > chip->controller hook is not populated before nand_scan() so it > > cannot be dereferenced: use chip->dummy_controller instead (which is > > statically allocated and will be referenced later by chip->controller > > anyway). > > 2/ through chip->controller if the driver implements its own controller. > > > > Another hook, ->detach_chip() is also introduced in order to clean the > > controller driver's potential allocations in case of failure of > > nand_scan_tail(). There is no need for the controller driver to call the > > ->detach_chip() hook directly upon error after a successful nand_scan(). > > In this situation, calling nand_release() as before is enough. > > > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal at bootlin.com> > > Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at bootlin.com> > > --- > > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c > > index 0aef0299f4f2..a64a344bf7a9 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c > > @@ -6697,6 +6697,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(nand_scan_tail); > > is_module_text_address((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0)) > > #endif > > > > +static int nand_attach(struct nand_chip *chip) > > +{ > > + if (chip->controller->ops && chip->controller->ops->attach_chip) > > + return chip->controller->ops->attach_chip(chip); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static void nand_detach(struct nand_chip *chip) > > +{ > > + if (chip->controller->ops && chip->controller->ops->detach_chip) > > + chip->controller->ops->detach_chip(chip); > > +} > > + > > /** > > * nand_scan_with_ids - [NAND Interface] Scan for the NAND device > > * @mtd: MTD device structure > > @@ -6710,11 +6724,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(nand_scan_tail); > > int nand_scan_with_ids(struct mtd_info *mtd, int maxchips, > > struct nand_flash_dev *ids) > > { > > + struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd); > > int ret; > > > > ret = nand_scan_ident(mtd, maxchips, ids); > > - if (!ret) > > - ret = nand_scan_tail(mtd); > > + if (ret) > > + return ret; > > + > > + ret = nand_attach(chip); > > + if (ret) > > + return ret; > > + > > + ret = nand_scan_tail(mtd); > > + if (ret) > > + nand_detach(chip); > > + > > return ret; > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(nand_scan_with_ids); > > @@ -6742,7 +6766,11 @@ void nand_cleanup(struct nand_chip *chip) > > > > /* Free manufacturer priv data. */ > > nand_manufacturer_cleanup(chip); > > + > > + /* Free controller specific allocations after chip identification */ > > + nand_detach(chip); > > } > > + > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nand_cleanup); > > > > /** > > diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h > > index eb5a053fd06b..d046b3a61205 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h > > +++ b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h > > @@ -509,6 +509,19 @@ struct nand_id { > > int len; > > }; > > > > +/** > > + * struct nand_controller_ops - Controller operations > > + * > > + * @attach_chip: Callback that may be called between nand_detect() and > > + * nand_scan_tail() during nand_scan() (optional). > > + * @detach_chip: Callback that may be called if nand_scan_tail() fails > > + * (optional). > > + */ > > +struct nand_controller_ops { > > + int (*attach_chip)(struct nand_chip *chip); > > + void (*detach_chip)(struct nand_chip *chip); > > +}; > > + > > /** > > * struct nand_controller - Control structure for hardware controller > > * shared among independent devices > > @@ -517,11 +530,13 @@ struct nand_id { > > * @wq: wait queue to sleep on if a NAND operation is in > > * progress used instead of the per chip wait queue > > * when a hw controller is available. > > + * @ops: NAND controller operations. > > */ > > struct nand_controller { > > spinlock_t lock; > > struct nand_chip *active; > > wait_queue_head_t wq; > > + const struct nand_controller_ops *ops; > > }; > > > > static inline void nand_controller_init(struct nand_controller *nfc) > > @@ -529,6 +544,7 @@ static inline void nand_controller_init(struct nand_controller *nfc) > > nfc->active = NULL; > > spin_lock_init(&nfc->lock); > > init_waitqueue_head(&nfc->wq); > > + nfc->ops = NULL; > > Hm, actually it does not work for all dummy controllers since this > function is called from nand_set_defaults() which is called from > nand_scan_ident(). That means the previous chip->dummy_controller.ops > assignment you might have done before calling nand_scan() is gone. > > Looks like we'll have to patch all drivers to call > nand_controller_init(&chip->dummy_controller), unless you see a better > option. Alternatively, we could assume that the nand_controller object is always zeroed at allocation time, and simply not assign nfc->ops from nand_controller_init() so that dummy controller drivers that need to pass non-NULL ops can do so before calling nand_scan().