[PATCH 4/5] mtd: rawnand: qcom: update BBT related flags

[miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx (Miquel Raynal)]

Abhishek,

Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal at bootlin.com> wrote on Wed, 18 Jul 2018
23:41:44 +0200:

> Hi Boris,
> 
> Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at bootlin.com> wrote on Wed, 18 Jul 2018
> 23:36:37 +0200:
> 
> > On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 23:15:26 +0200
> > Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal at bootlin.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > Hi Abhishek,
> > > 
> > > Abhishek Sahu <absahu at codeaurora.org> wrote on Fri,  6 Jul 2018
> > > 13:21:58 +0530:
> > >     
> > > > Remove the NAND_SKIP_BBTSCAN to use RAM based BBT.      
> > > 
> > > Unless I am understanding it the wrong way, NAND_SKIP_BBTSCAN will skip
> > > the scan of the on-chip BBT and will scan every block to construct a
> > > RAM, based BBT thanks to the BBM.
> > > 
> > > So flash based BBT is already unused and removing this flag is a
> > > mistake, right?    
> >   
> > ->scan_bbt() is also taking care of building the in-RAM BBT based on    
> > BBM when no on-flash BBT is provided, so I think it's the right thing
> > to do.  
> 
> Oh right. Then doing so is harmless.

Could you please update the commit log to reflect this aspect?

> 
> Thanks for the clarification.
> Miqu?l