[2/3] mtd: rawnand: micron: Disable ECC earlier in the read path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Boris,

Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at bootlin.com> wrote on Tue, 17 Jul 2018
23:31:43 +0200:

> On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 21:27:26 +0000
> Chris Packham <Chris.Packham at alliedtelesis.co.nz> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Boris,
> > 
> > On 17/07/18 23:42, Boris Brezillon wrote:  
> > > On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 22:42:54 +0000
> > > Chris Packham <Chris.Packham at alliedtelesis.co.nz> wrote:
> > >     
> > >> On 17/07/18 08:55, Boris Brezillon wrote:    
> > >>> On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 18:10:57 +0200
> > >>> Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at bootlin.com> wrote:
> > >>>        
> > >>>> On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 09:00:59 +0000
> > >>>> Chris Packham <Chris.Packham at alliedtelesis.co.nz> wrote:
> > >>>>       
> > >>>>> Hi Boris,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On 04/07/18 00:20, Boris Brezillon wrote:    
> > >>>>>> We are about to support extracting the real number of bitflips for
> > >>>>>> 4-bits ECC when WRITE_RECOMMEND is returned. This requires re-reading
> > >>>>>> the page in raw mode to compare it to the corrected version, and this
> > >>>>>> logic will be placed in micron_nand_on_die_ecc_status_4().
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Moving the micron_nand_on_die_ecc_setup() will allow us to disable
> > >>>>>> ECC only once.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> As a result, we have to rework the exit path and add an error path
> > >>>>>> where the ECC is disabled.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at bootlin.com>    
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> As I said on the other thread this appears to cause a problem for me on
> > >>>>> the MT29F1G08ABAFAWP-ITE setup I have. I notice we're not able to find
> > >>>>> the BBT, not sure if that is symptom or cause.    
> > >>>
> > >>> It's most likely the symptom, not the cause.
> > >>>        
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c
> > >>>>>> index 63ac98a36ed7..b9cbaf125a98 100644
> > >>>>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c
> > >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c
> > >>>>>> @@ -197,30 +197,37 @@ micron_nand_read_page_on_die_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
> > >>>>>>     
> > >>>>>>     	ret = nand_read_page_op(chip, page, 0, NULL, 0);
> > >>>>>>     	if (ret)
> > >>>>>> -		goto out;
> > >>>>>> +		goto err_disable_ecc;
> > >>>>>>     
> > >>>>>>     	ret = nand_status_op(chip, &status);
> > >>>>>>     	if (ret)
> > >>>>>> -		goto out;
> > >>>>>> +		goto err_disable_ecc;
> > >>>>>>     
> > >>>>>>     	ret = nand_exit_status_op(chip);
> > >>>>>>     	if (ret)
> > >>>>>> -		goto out;
> > >>>>>> +		goto err_disable_ecc;
> > >>>>>>     
> > >>>>>> -	if (chip->ecc.strength == 4)
> > >>>>>> -		max_bitflips = micron_nand_on_die_ecc_status_4(chip, status);
> > >>>>>> -	else
> > >>>>>> -		max_bitflips = micron_nand_on_die_ecc_status_8(chip, status);
> > >>>>>> +	micron_nand_on_die_ecc_setup(chip, false);    
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Hm, can you try to move the micron_nand_on_die_ecc_setup(chip, false)
> > >>>> call just before nand_exit_status_op()?
> > >>>>       
> > >>>
> > >>> Just pushed a branch fixing that [1]. Can you test it? If it works,
> > >>> I'll ask Miquel to drop the initial set of patches and instead pick the
> > >>> fixed ones so that we don't break bisectibility.
> > >>>
> > >>> [1]https://github.com/bbrezillon/linux-0day/commits/nand/next
> > >>>        
> > >>
> > >> Still appears to have the same problem.
> > >>
> > >> I'm guessing that since you can't actually disable ecc on this chip
> > >> calling micron_nand_on_die_ecc_setup(chip, false); before reading the
> > >> oob data interferes with it somehow (if I call it after there is no
> > >> problem).
> > >>
> > >> We could add code to qualify the attempt to disable ecc early based on
> > >> it being optional/mandatory or just stick with it being disabled late.    
> > > 
> > > Okay. I gave up on disabling ECC earlier and instead implemented what
> > > you suggested. Can you test
> > > https://github.com/bbrezillon/linux-0day/commits/nand/next again and
> > > let me know if it works for you?    
> > 
> > Yes that works for me. Feel free to add
> > 
> > Tested-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham at alliedtelesis.co.nz>
> > 
> > to
> > 
> > 88240e244026 mtd: rawnand: micron: Make ECC activation stateful
> > 6ae7f205cec0 mtd: rawnand: micron: Avoid enabling/disabling ECC when it 
> > can't be disabled  
> 
> Okay, cool.
> 
> Miquel, can you drop:
> 
> 683ca8a70738 mtd: rawnand: micron: Get the actual number of bitflips
> d73e5d29aa29 mtd: rawnand: micron: Disable ECC earlier in the read path
> db2d37331813 mtd: rawnand: micron: Stop passing mtd to ecc_status() funcs
> 51f3b3970a8c mtd: rawnand: micron: detect forced on-die ECC
> 386fc2609d15 mtd: rawnand: micron: support 8/512 on-die ECC
> 
> I'll send a new patch series soon.

Above patches dropped, thank you both for working on (and fixing) this.

I'll wait for the new series.

Thanks,
Miqu?l



[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux