Am Dienstag, 17. Juli 2018, 17:06:12 CEST schrieb Steve deRosier: > > > While having a cup of coffee I thought more about this. > > > Actually both, MTD and UBI makes sense. > > > The most important issue is that you integrate it with the existing diskstats. > > > So instead of having our own interface feeding MTD/UBI stats into diskstats > > > would be nice. Did you look into that? I'm not sure how much work this would be. > > > That way users can use existing tools such as iostat... > > I actually started out looking for the information under diskstats, > > then I learned it's only for block devices. I took a quick glance at > > it before I went for the sys implementation instead. diskstats is > > separated from the MTD and UBI stuff and I don't know if one can make a > > connection to MTD/UBI somehow. I will take a closer look at this. > > Perhaps it was "only for block devices" because no one ever > implemented the necessary hooks in MTD or UBI? I don't know the > history, nor the information you found, just making a stab in the > dark. > > If UBI and/or MTD can provide the statistics that diskstats needs in a > interpretation that makes sense, why not go that way? Yeah, that's what I have in mind. Maybe we can easily teach diskstats about MTD. Thanks, //richard