On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 11:54:54 +0200 Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal at bootlin.com> wrote: > In order to remove the limitation that forbids dynamic allocation in > nand_scan_ident(), we must create a path that will be the same for all > controller drivers. The idea is to use nand_scan() instead of the widely > implemented nand_scan_ident()/nand_scan_tail() couple. In order to ^ used > achieve this, controller drivers will need to adjust some parameters > between these two functions depending on the NAND chip wired on them. > > For that, a hook called ->attach_chip() is created in the > nand_controller structure. This structure may be referenced by two ways: This is no longer true. Now ->attach_chip() is part of nand_controller_ops, and nand_controller has a pointer to a nand_controller_ops implementation. > 1/ if the driver does not implement its own controller, the > chip->controller hook is not populated before nand_scan() so it > cannot be dereferenced: use chip->hwcontrol instead (which is > statically allocated and will be referenced later by chip->controller > anyway). Not related to this patch, but I'd rename chip->hwcontrol into chip->dummycontroller or something that clearly shows that this field should only be used when the controller driver is dumb and can only control a single chip. > 2/ through chip->controller if the driver implements its own controller. > > Another hook, ->detach_chip() is also introduced in order to clean the > controller driver's potential allocations in case of failure of > nand_scan_tail(). There is no need for the controller driver to call the > ->detach_chip() hook directly upon error after a successful nand_scan(). > In this situation, calling nand_release() as before is enough. > > Both ->attac/detach_chip() hooks are located in a nand_controller_ops > structure. > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal at bootlin.com> The implementation looks good (one minor comment below, but you can ignore it if you disagree), so once you've fixed the commit message you can add Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at bootlin.com> > --- > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++-- > include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c > index e21f03ee3251..5e8278281ba8 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c > @@ -6710,11 +6710,23 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(nand_scan_tail); > int nand_scan_with_ids(struct mtd_info *mtd, int maxchips, > struct nand_flash_dev *ids) > { > + struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd); > int ret; > > ret = nand_scan_ident(mtd, maxchips, ids); > - if (!ret) > - ret = nand_scan_tail(mtd); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + if (chip->controller->ops && chip->controller->ops->attach_chip) { > + ret = chip->controller->ops->attach_chip(chip); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + } > + > + ret = nand_scan_tail(mtd); > + if (ret && chip->controller->ops && chip->controller->ops->detach_chip) > + chip->controller->ops->detach_chip(chip); I'd recommend creating wrappers for detach/attach operations, just in case you need to automate more things in there: static int nand_attach(struct nand_chip *chip) { if (chip->controller->ops && chip->controller->ops->attach_chip) return chip->controller->ops->attach_chip(chip); return 0; } static void nand_detach(struct nand_chip *chip) { if (chip->controller->ops && chip->controller->ops->detach_chip) chip->controller->ops->detach_chip(chip); } > + > return ret; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(nand_scan_with_ids); > @@ -6742,7 +6754,12 @@ void nand_cleanup(struct nand_chip *chip) > > /* Free manufacturer priv data. */ > nand_manufacturer_cleanup(chip); > + > + /* Free controller specific allocations after chip identification */ > + if (chip->controller->ops && chip->controller->ops->detach_chip) > + chip->controller->ops->detach_chip(chip); > } > + > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nand_cleanup); > > /** > diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h > index f5fb9caf6dca..d1f2267ae724 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h > +++ b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h > @@ -509,6 +509,19 @@ struct nand_id { > int len; > }; > > +/** > + * struct nand_controller_ops - Controller operations > + * > + * @attach_chip: Callback that may be called between nand_detect() and ^nand_scan_ident()? > + * nand_scan_tail() during nand_scan() (optional). > + * @detach_chip: Callback that may be called if nand_scan_tail() fails > + * (optional). > + */ > +struct nand_controller_ops { > + int (*attach_chip)(struct nand_chip *chip); > + void (*detach_chip)(struct nand_chip *chip); > +}; > + > /** > * struct nand_controller - Control structure for hardware controller > * shared among independent devices > @@ -517,11 +530,13 @@ struct nand_id { > * @wq: wait queue to sleep on if a NAND operation is in > * progress used instead of the per chip wait queue > * when a hw controller is available. > + * @ops: NAND controller operations. > */ > struct nand_controller { > spinlock_t lock; > struct nand_chip *active; > wait_queue_head_t wq; > + const struct nand_controller_ops *ops; > }; > > static inline void nand_controller_init(struct nand_controller *nfc) > @@ -529,6 +544,7 @@ static inline void nand_controller_init(struct nand_controller *nfc) > nfc->active = NULL; > spin_lock_init(&nfc->lock); > init_waitqueue_head(&nfc->wq); > + nfc->ops = NULL; > } > > /**