On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 13:27:53 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 1:16 PM, Boris Brezillon > <boris.brezillon at bootlin.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 22:09:25 +0200 > > Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at bootlin.com> wrote: > > > >> It just makes NAND maintainers' life easier by allowing them to > >> compile-test this driver without having ARCH_S3C24XX or ARCH_S3C64XX > >> enabled. > >> > >> We add a dependency on HAS_IOMEM to make sure the driver compiles > >> correctly, and a dependency on !IA64 because the {read,write}s{bwl}() > >> accessors are not defined for this architecture. > > > > I see that SPARC does not define those accessors either. So I guess we > > should add depends on !SPARC. > > > > Arnd, any other way to know when the platform implements > > {read,write}s{bwl}() accessors? > > I'd just consider that a bug, and send a patch to fix sparc64 if it's broken. > sparc32 appears to have these, and when Thierry sent the patch > to implement them everywhere[1], he said that he tested sparc64 as > well, so either something regressed since then, or his testing > was incomplete. Either way, the correct answer IMHO would be to > make it work rather than to add infrastructure around the broken > configurations. I guess the same goes for IA64 then.