[PATCH 1/4] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change write buffer to check correct value

[ikegami@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (IKEGAMI Tokunori)]

Hi Greg-san,

Let me confirm below.
About the patches 2, 3 and 4 below still should I prepare the commit IDs for revised version?
Or those can be added to the stable trees next time without commit IDs?

>   Patch: 2. 85a82e28b023 mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change definition naming
> to retry write operation
>          3. 45f75b8a919a mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change erase functions
> to retry for error
>          4. 79ca484b6130 mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change erase functions
> to check chip good only
> 
>   Note: The commit IDs are on mainline so there are not existed for
> revised version patches.

I think that the patches revised version are still existing on the linux-mtd Patchwork without commit IDs.
  <https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-mtd/list/?series=53133&state=*>

Sorry for this confirmation but I am not sure how to resolve this to apply these revised version patches to stable trees.

Regards,
Ikegami

> -----Original Message-----
> From: IKEGAMI Tokunori
> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2018 4:34 PM
> To: 'Greg Kroah-Hartman'
> Cc: PACKHAM Chris; Brian Norris; David Woodhouse; Boris Brezillon; Marek
> Vasut; Richard Weinberger; Cyrille Pitchen;
> linux-mtd at lists.infradead.org; stable at vger.kernel.org; Boris
> Brezillon
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/4] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change write buffer to
> check correct value
> 
> The 1 patch below has been added to review into the following 5 trees.
> 
>   Patch: 1. dfeae1073583 mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change write buffer to
> check correct value
> 
>   Tree: 1. 3.18-stable
>         2. 4.4-stable
>         3. 4.9-stable
>         4. 4.14-stable
>         5. 4.17-stable
> 
> So please applied the remaining 3 patches below as same.
> 
>   Patch: 2. 85a82e28b023 mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change definition naming
> to retry write operation
>          3. 45f75b8a919a mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change erase functions
> to retry for error
>          4. 79ca484b6130 mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change erase functions
> to check chip good only
> 
>   Note: The commit IDs are on mainline so there are not existed for
> revised version patches.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gregkh at linuxfoundation.org]
> > Sent: Monday, July 02, 2018 4:23 PM
> > To: IKEGAMI Tokunori
> > Cc: PACKHAM Chris; Brian Norris; David Woodhouse; Boris Brezillon;
> Marek
> > Vasut; Richard Weinberger; Cyrille Pitchen;
> > linux-mtd at lists.infradead.org; stable at vger.kernel.org; Boris
> > Brezillon
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change write buffer to
> > check correct value
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 07:16:47AM +0000, IKEGAMI Tokunori wrote:
> > > Hi Greg-san,
> > >
> > > The commit IDs on mainline are below.
> > >
> > >   1. dfeae1073583 mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change write buffer to check
> > correct value
> > >   2. 85a82e28b023 mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change definition naming to
> > retry write operation
> > >   3. 45f75b8a919a mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change erase functions to
> > retry for error
> > >   4. 79ca484b6130 mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change erase functions to
> > check chip good only
> > >
> > > Note:
> > >   The patches just sent today as revised are only existing with commit
> > IDs on my local environment.
> > >   Also the patches are existing on the Linux MTD development
> patchwork
> > as below but the commit IDs are not assigned.
> > >
> >
> <https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-mtd/list/?series=53133>
> > >
> > >   If those revised patches should be applied anywhere to have commit
> > IDs at first please let me know.
> > >   Probably it should be consulted with the MTD maintainer Boris-san.
> >
> > And what stable tree(s) do you want to see these applied to?
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h