Am Montag, 2. Juli 2018, 08:52:27 CEST schrieb Boris Brezillon: > On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 08:44:33 +0200 > Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz at bootlin.com> wrote: > > > Hi Richard, Boris, > > > > On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 10:50:41PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > > > Am Sonntag, 1. Juli 2018, 22:33:47 CEST schrieb Boris Brezillon: > > > > On Sun, 01 Jul 2018 21:35:57 +0200 > > > > Richard Weinberger <richard at nod.at> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Quentin, > > > > > > > > > > Am Donnerstag, 28. Juni 2018, 09:40:53 CEST schrieb Quentin Schulz: > > > > > > Now that we have the logic for skipping CRC check for static UBI volumes > > > > > > in the core, let's expose it to users. > > > > > > > > > > > > This makes use of a padding byte in the volume description data > > > > > > structure as a flag. This flag only tell for now whether we should skip > > > > > > the CRC check of a volume. > > > > > > > > > > > > This checks the UBI volume for which we are trying to skip the CRC check > > > > > > is static. > > > > > > > > > > > > Suggested-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at bootlin.com> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz at bootlin.com> > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at bootlin.com> > > > > > > --- > > > > > > drivers/mtd/ubi/cdev.c | 4 ++++ > > > > > > drivers/mtd/ubi/vmt.c | 3 +++ > > > > > > include/uapi/mtd/ubi-user.h | 16 ++++++++++++++-- > > > > > > 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/cdev.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/cdev.c > > > > > > index 45c3296..3eea1df 100644 > > > > > > --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/cdev.c > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/cdev.c > > > > > > @@ -622,6 +622,10 @@ static int verify_mkvol_req(const struct ubi_device *ubi, > > > > > > req->vol_type != UBI_STATIC_VOLUME) > > > > > > goto bad; > > > > > > > > > > > > + if (req->flags & UBI_VOL_SKIP_CRC_CHECK_FLG && > > > > > > > > Oops, missed that req->flags & UBI_VOL_SKIP_CRC_CHECK_FLG check was > > > > missing parens (checkpatch --strict should complain about that). > > > > > > Latest when building my local branch or in linux-next we had noticed. > > > No need to worry. > > > > > > > > > + req->vol_type != UBI_STATIC_VOLUME) > > > > > > + goto bad; > > > > > > > > > > We should also reject unknown flags here. > > > > > > > > I agree. > > > > Should I send another version of my patches for it? Yes. Please. > Yes please, respin your series with this additional check. Just define > > #define UBI_VOL_VALID_FLGS (UBI_VOL_SKIP_CRC_CHECK_FLG) > > and then, in verify_mkvol_req() add > > if (req->flags & ~UBI_VOL_VALID_FLGS) > goto bad; Yep. > > Same for > > parenthesis around the flags masking above? > > No need to fix that one (unless Richard cares), as it seems I had it > wrong. Nah. If both gcc and checkpatch don't complain, let's keep it as-is. Thanks, //richard