Re: [PATCH v7 10/26] x86/insn-eval: Add utility functions to get segment selector

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 11:37:51AM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> Wouldn't this be ending up mixing the actual segment register and
> segment register overrides? I plan to have a function that parses the
> segment override prefixes and returns SEG_REG_CS/DS/ES/FS/GS or
> SEG_REG_IGNORE for long mode or SEG_REG_DEFAULT when the default segment
> register needs to be used. A separate function will determine what such
> default segment register is. Does this make sense?



SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-msdos" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Console]     [Linux Audio]     [Linux for Hams]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux