On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 21:24:44 +0100
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Gary Guo" <gary@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 16:57:36 +0100
> > Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> The `Index` implementation on `BStr` was lost when we switched `BStr` from
> >> a type alias of `[u8]` to a newtype. This patch adds back `Index` by
> >> implementing `Index` for `BStr` when `Index` would be implemented for
> >> `[u8]`.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> rust/kernel/str.rs | 11 +++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/rust/kernel/str.rs b/rust/kernel/str.rs
> >> index 002dcddf7c768..1eb945bed77d6 100644
> >> --- a/rust/kernel/str.rs
> >> +++ b/rust/kernel/str.rs
> >> @@ -114,6 +114,17 @@ fn eq(&self, other: &Self) -> bool {
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> +impl<Idx> Index<Idx> for BStr
> >> +where
> >> + Idx: core::slice::SliceIndex<[u8], Output = [u8]>,
> >
> > I think I'd prefer
> >
> > [T]: Index<Idx>,
>
> Is that equivalent?
Sorry, I meant `[u8]: Index<Idx>`. This makes more semantic sense that
"what ever can index a byte slice, it can also index BStr". This is
also how our CStr and the array primitive type implements its Index
operation.
They should be equivalent as libcore does
impl<T, I> Index<I> for [T] where I: SliceIndex<[T]> { ... }
Best,
Gary
>
>
> Best regards,
> Andreas Hindborg
>
>
