On 1/29/25 09:52, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2025-01-27 13:22:17 [+0100], Petr Pavlu wrote: >> On 1/24/25 18:49, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >>> On 2025-01-13 12:09:27 [+0100], Petr Pavlu wrote: >>>> Thanks for this cleanup. I've queued the fix in patch #1 on >>>> modules-fixes. For the rest, I plan to give folks more time to look at >>>> the changes as this affects a number of subsystems. If there are no >>>> other concerns, I'd then add the series on modules-next. >>> >>> #26 (kprobes) clashes with the changes that have been merged upstream. >>> Do you want me to resend the whole series or just #26? The other patches >>> apply cleanly so far. >> >> I think sending only the updated patch #26 should be sufficient in this >> case, it's only a small adjustment. Please preferably post it as a reply >> to the email with that specific patch. > > I just sent two updates: > > [PATCH v3.5 25/28] bpf: Use RCU in all users of __module_text_address(). > [PATCH v3.5 26/28] kprobes: Use RCU in all users of __module_text_address(). I've now queued the series and its two updated patches #25 and #26 on modules-next (for 6.15-rc1). -- Thanks, Petr
