Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] tracing: Introduce relative stacktrace

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2025-01-28 11:27, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 10:46:21 -0500
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

This does not handle the situation where a module is already loaded
before tracing starts. In LTTng we have a statedump facility for this,
where we can iterate on all modules at trace start and dump the relevant
information.

You may want to consider a similar approach for other tracers.

Last night Masami and I were talking about this. The idea I was thinking of
was to simply have a module load notifier that would add modules to an
array. It would only keep track of loaded modules, and when the trace hit,
if the address was outside of core text, it would search the array for the
module, and use that. When a module is removed, it would also be removed
from the array. We currently do not support tracing module removal (if the
module is traced, the buffers are cleared when the module is removed).

I'm trying to wrap my head around what you are trying to achieve here.

So AFAIU you are aiming to store the relative offset from kernel _text
and module base text address into the traced events rather than the
actual address.

Based on Masami's cover letter, this appears to be  done to make sure
users can get to this base+offset information even if they cannot read
kallsyms.

Why make the tracing fast path more complex for a simple matter of
accessing this base address information ?

All you need to have to convert from kernel address to base + offset is:

- The kernel _text base address,
- Each loaded module text base address,
- Unloaded modules events to prune this information.

What is wrong with simply exporting this base address information in the
trace buffers rather than rely on kallsyms, and deal with the conversion
to module name / base+offset at post-processing ?

Thanks,

Mathieu


If it is a module address, set the MSB, and for 32 bit machines use the
next 7 bits as an index into the module array, and for 64 bit machines, use
the next 10 bits as an index. This would be exposed in the format file for
the kernel_stack_rel event, so if these numbers change, user space can cope
with it. In fact, it would need to use the format file to distinguish the
32 bit and 64 bit values.

That is, a stack trace will contain addresses that are core kernel simply
subtracted from ".text", and the modules address would have the MSB set,
the next bits would be an index into that array that holds the module
information, and the address would be the address minus the module address
where it was loaded.

This way we do not need to save the information from any events. Also, for
the persistent ring buffer, this array could live in that memory, so that
it will be available on the next boot.





--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux