On 2025-01-09 10:38:03 [-0800], Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > lgtm. > Should we take into bpf-next or the whole set is handled together > somewhere? If you don't mind, I would hope to route the whole series via the modules tree. Some of the lower functions (__module_address()) check for disabled preemption and will trigger warnings at runtime if this gets applied before (earlier in the series) the check gets replaced. Sebastian