On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 3:26 AM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 12:50:48PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 8:30 AM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 08:42:22PM +0000, Sami Tolvanen wrote: > > > > Add a basic DWARF parser, which uses libdw to traverse the debugging > > > > information in an object file and looks for functions and variables. > > > > In follow-up patches, this will be expanded to produce symbol versions > > > > for CONFIG_MODVERSIONS from DWARF. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Reviewed-by: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@xxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > kernel/module/Kconfig | 8 ++ > > > > scripts/Makefile | 1 + > > > > scripts/gendwarfksyms/.gitignore | 2 + > > > > > > This doesn't add scripts/gendwarfksyms to MAINTAINERS > > > but then again scripts/genksyms/ is not there either > > > but it does got to Masahiro. > > > > scripts/genksyms/ is a very old tool with no maintainer. > > > > It defaults to the maintainer of the scripts/ directory (i.e. me) > > > > > Masahiro, should we just add both to KERNEL BUILD and add > > > Sami as a Reviewer to help with gendwarfksyms? > > > > I think it is better to have a separate entry for > > > > F: scripts/gendwarfksyms/ > > > > with Sami as the maintainer. > > OK do you want this and the extended modversions to go through your tree > or modules tree? > > Luis I guess I can pick up them. I was just thinking about a possibility to make this (and the other one) less worse. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
