Re: [PATCH v3] selftests: add new kallsyms selftests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 03:10:34PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Despite the warning, I gave this a try on m68k (cross-compiled on i7 ;-).
> However, I didn't notice any extra-ordinary build times.

I had some large values before this got merged and due to this
slowing down builds 2x I reduced the defaults. The current defaults
are no known as TEST_KALLSYMS_LARGE.

> Also, when running the test manually on ARAnyM, everything runs
> in the blink of an eye.  I didn't use the script, but ran all commands
> manually.  I tried insmodding a/b/c/d, c/a/b, a/c/d/b.
> 
> Is this expected?

I tried to clarify the ranges known we can use to mess with this test
a bit more in the recent fixes on modules-next [0] so since you want
to see some things blow up try TEST_KALLSYMS_MAX, on some systems this
is reported to crash the build.

It is why I had reduced the original values a bit...

[0] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/modules/linux.git modules-next

  Luis





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux