On 10.10.24 10:42, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 10:29 AM Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 10:19 AM Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 10.10.24 09:00, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> >> That was wrong in the original code which you moved: >> >> +config MODULE_SIG_SHA384 >> + bool "SHA-384" >> + select CRYPTO_SHA512 <--- SHA*384* > > Thorsten, please fix it! That looks intentional to me -- and CRYPTO_SHA384 from a quick look does not even exist. But that's not at all my area of expertise, so I would not want to touch it anyway. Ciao, Thorsten P.S.: Vegard Nossum mentioned in the fediverse that I could also solve the problem the patch is about by adding "default MODULE_SIG_SHA512" to the "choice" section; haven't tried that, but that sounds like a better solution. Will likely give it a try, unless someone brings up unwanted side effects this might cause.
