Re: [PATCH 0/2] kmod /usr support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2024/08/21, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 05:37:31PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 3:37 AM Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 01:13:53PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > > >Hello,
> > > >
> > > >This is resend of the last patch in the series that adds prefix support
> > > >to kernel module location together with additional patch for validating
> > > >the user supplied input to options that are interpreted as directories.
> > > >
> > > >Thanks
> > >
> > > applied, thanks
> > >
> > > Lucas De Marchi
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > If I understood this correctly, MODULE_DIRECTORY is determined
> > by "configure --with-module-directory=...", and there is no
> > way to change it after that.
> > 
> > 
> > If so, how to work with cross-building?
> > 
> > Cross-building is typical when building embedded Linux systems.
> > 
> > 
> > Consider this scenario:
> > 
> > - Your build machine adopts
> >     MODULE_DIRECTORY=/usr/lib/modules
> > - The target embedded system adopts
> >     MODULE_DIRECTORY=/lib/modules
> > 
> > (or vice a versa)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > depmod is used also for cross-building because
> > it is executed as a part of "make module_install".
> > 
> > 
> > The counterpart patch set for Kbuild provides
> > KERNEL_MODULE_DIRECTORY, which only changes
> > the destination directory to which *.ko are copied.
> > 
> > You cannot change the directory where the
> > depmod searches for modules, as it is fixed
> > at the compile-time of kmod.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > In this case, what we can do is to build another
> > instance of kmod configured for the target system,
> > and use it for modules_install:
> > 
> > 1. In the kmod source directory
> >     ./configure --with=module-directory=/lib/modules
> >     make
> > 
> > 2. make modules_install INSTALL_MOD_PATH=<staging-dir>
> >      KERNEL_MODULE_DIRECTORY=/lib/modules
> >      DEPMOD=<new-depmod-you-has-just-built>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > If you use OpenEmbedded etc., this is what you do
> > because host tools are built from sources.
> > 
> > But, should it be required all the time?
> > Even when the target embedded system uses
> > busybox-based modprobe instead of kmod?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > depmod provides --basedir option, which changes
> > the prefix part, but there is no way to override
> > the stem part, MODULE_DIRECTRY.
> > 
> > In the review of the counter patch set,
> > I am suggesting an option to override MODULE_DIRECTRY
> > (let's say --moduledir) at least for depmod.
> > 
> > (Perhaps modinfo too, as it also supports --basedir)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Then, we can change scripts/depmod.sh so that
> > Kbuild can propagate KERNEL_MODULE_DIRECTORY
> > to depmod.
> > 
> > 
> > if  <depmod supports --moduledir>; then
> >     set -- "$@"  --moduledir "${KERNEL_MODULE_DIRECTORY}"
> > fi
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Does it make sense?
> 
> Did this conversation go anywhere? After the upgrade to kmod 33 in Arch
> Linux, which includes building with the configuration option
> '--with-module-directory' set to '/usr/lib/modules' [1], building a
> tarzst-pkg breaks for me, seemingly for the reason noted above.
> 
>   $ make -skj"$(nproc)" ARCH=x86_64 CROSS_COMPILE=x86_64-linux- O=$HOME/tmp/build/linux defconfig tarzst-pkg
>   depmod: ERROR: could not open directory /home/nathan/tmp/build/linux/tar-install/usr/lib/modules/6.11.0-rc4-00019-gb311c1b497e5: No such file or directory
>   depmod: FATAL: could not search modules: No such file or directory
> 
>   $ ls $HOME/tmp/build/linux/tar-install
>   boot  lib
> 
> I don't see how to get around this without an option to override
> MODULE_DIRECTORY.
> 
> I guess I'll ask Arch Linux to revert this option for the time being, as
> it mentions they do not really need it at the moment.
> 
> [1]: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/kmod/-/commit/0efd732cb78bc0b7851a8367f4dc8e6933f5b99d
> 

Since we've officially (?) switched to Github for issues, I opened one
[1].

I suspect it would be a little harder to get lost in the noise, although
Github and all that.

Everyone feel free to subscribe, comment ... or even send some patches.
Ideally we'll get Michal to help this although I'm not sure how busy he
is.

HTH
Emil

[1] https://github.com/kmod-project/kmod/issues/85




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux