On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 10:44:12PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > > > Personally, I prefer the implementation of method two. > > But there's also method zero --- keep things the way they are, and > don't try to add a new astraction. > > Advantage: > > -- Code has worked for decades, so it is very well tested > -- Very easy to understand and maintain > > Disadvantage > > --- A few extra lines of C code. > > which we need to weigh against the other choices. I think option zero is the right option for you and David and anyone scared of link order issues. But I know for XFS or the nvme code having multiple initcalls per module would be extremely helpfu. I don't really want to drag Youling into implementing something he is not behind, but I plan to try that out myself once I find a little time.
