On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 02:10:45PM +0300, Andrew Kanner wrote: > On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 10:13:54AM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > > > While you're at it, if you want to try it, you could see if you can > > improve the situation more by looking at symbol_get() users that remain > > and seeing if you can instead fix it with proper Kconfig dependency and > > at build time. Then we can just remove it as well. > > > > Luis > > Sorry for the late reply. > > Luis, can you give more details of your idea? I re-read it once, then > came back and still don't understand. > > I see that there are ~10 users for symbol_get() currently. Do you want > to stringify symbol names at build time to completely remove > symbol_get() from module.h? Correct me if I'm wrong since using of a > fuction which is not declared anywhere sounds confusing. As an example look at the code and see if there's a sensible way to make some calls built-in instead of part of the module, then the module can have a kconfig builtin option, that adds to the built-in code which means you don't need the symbol_get(). For some other pieces of code it may require other strategies. Luis
