On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 05:06:24PM -0500, Kent Overstreet wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 10:26:48AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 11:39 PM Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It seems most of my points from the previous review were refused... > > Look, Andy, this is a pretty tiny part of the patchset, yet it's been > eating up a pretty disproprortionate amount of time and your review > feedback has been pretty unhelpful - asking for things to be broken up > in ways that would not be bisectable, or (as here) re-asking the same > things that I've already answered and that should've been obvious. > > The code works. If you wish to complain about anything being broken, or > if you can come up with anything more actionable than what you've got > here, I will absolutely respond to that, but otherwise I'm just going to > leave things where they sit. I do not understand why I should do *your* job. Nevertheless, I have just sent my version of this change. Enjoy! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
