Re: [PATCH v2] module: Don't ignore errors from set_memory_XX()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Le 16/02/2024 à 20:28, Kees Cook a écrit :
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 09:14:27AM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> set_memory_ro(), set_memory_nx(), set_memory_x() and other helpers
>> can fail and return an error. In that case the memory might not be
>> protected as expected and the module loading has to be aborted to
>> avoid security issues.
>>
>> Check return value of all calls to set_memory_XX() and handle
>> error if any.
>>
>> Add a check to not call set_memory_XX() on NULL pointers as some
>> architectures may not like it allthough numpages is always 0 in that
>> case. This also avoid a useless call to set_vm_flush_reset_perms().
>>
>> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/7
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Yay! Glad to see this happening. Universal __must_check for set_memory_*()
> starts to appear on the horizon. ;)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 

Thanks

I also sent 3 patches to powerpc, I forgot to copy you but I put the 
links in https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/7

Christophe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux