On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 04:54:14PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Commit 9bbb9e5a3310 ("param: use ops in struct kernel_param, rather than
> get and set fns directly") added the comment that module_param_call()
> was deprecated, during a large scale refactoring to bring sanity to type
> casting back then. In 2017 following more cleanups, it became useful
> again as it wraps a common pattern of creating an ops struct for a
> given get/set pair:
>
> b2f270e87473 ("module: Prepare to convert all module_param_call() prototypes")
> ece1996a21ee ("module: Do not paper over type mismatches in module_param_call()")
>
> static const struct kernel_param_ops __param_ops_##name = \
> { .flags = 0, .set = _set, .get = _get }; \
> __module_param_call(MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX, \
> name, &__param_ops_##name, arg, perm, -1, 0)
>
> __module_param_call(MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX, name, ops, arg, perm, -1, 0)
>
> Many users of module_param_cb() appear to be almost universally
> open-coding the same thing that module_param_call() does now. Don't
> discourage[1] people from using module_param_call(): clarify the comment
> to show that module_param_cb() is useful if you repeatedly use the same
> pair of get/set functions.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202308301546.5C789E5EC@keescook/
>
> Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-modules@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Reviewed-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Applied and pushed to modules-next, thanks
> ---
> Luis, I note that include/linux/moduleparam.h isn't in the MAINTAINERS
> file pattern. Perhaps you want to use include/linux/module*.h?
Sent patch! Thanks!
Luis
